toffee
Well-known member
Any idea? Did any of our starters played?
Who played today on our OL and front 7?
- Thread starter toffee
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2015
- Messages
- 9,751
- Reaction score
- 9,697
I thought i heard them say... there was only but like a handful of starters on offense, playing a few reps, but we were mainly fielding all 2nd and 3rd stringers. And not subbing as much on the defensive side.
HawkRiderFan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2011
- Messages
- 2,756
- Reaction score
- 1,918
I couldn't see anyone on the o-line who was a starter.
No starters .........
From left to right ...... Forsythe, Eiland, Oluwatimi, Bradford, Curhan on the OL.
Too much rotation for me to keep up with on the front 7 defense ...... as will be the "in game" case during the regular season.
From left to right ...... Forsythe, Eiland, Oluwatimi, Bradford, Curhan on the OL.
Too much rotation for me to keep up with on the front 7 defense ...... as will be the "in game" case during the regular season.
JerHawk81
Well-known member
I also don't think many of the D front 7 starers played today. Bush played a ton, but he may be only starter on day 1 from the front 7 to play today.
Mike Jackson played a ton at CB. His future with the team is as unclear as anyone; I could see Jackson starting week 1, being an active backup, making the roster but being chronically inactive, being traded, or being released.
Mike Jackson played a ton at CB. His future with the team is as unclear as anyone; I could see Jackson starting week 1, being an active backup, making the roster but being chronically inactive, being traded, or being released.
SNDavidson
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2009
- Messages
- 3,240
- Reaction score
- 1,153
Or moving to a career in pop music and dancing
OP
OP
toffee
Well-known member
From left to right ...... Forsythe, Eiland, Oluwatimi, Bradford, Curhan on the OL? No wonder no holes for Charbonnet
HawkRiderFan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2011
- Messages
- 2,756
- Reaction score
- 1,918
I would like to think the Hawks can get something for him in a trade but how do you stop any potential trade partner from not having seen film of the last 2 games?
MORGULON
Well-known member
How about the sleepovers?
It looked to me like they couldn't push greenbay off the LOS... they got some work to do.
Just my take
LTH
Also a poor time of year for trades. With all the players getting released this week, teams will be watching the waiver wire instead.
Appreciate your take.
I thought the Packers deployed personnel that demonstrated a disruptive advantage in quickness. And, I think the working the passing game was the priority.
Challenging the long 6'-8" pairing of Forsythe and Eiland.
Oluwatimi was coming off a preseason game 2 elbow injury.
Bradford's, alleged, limited lateral quickness wasn't a pass blocking liability.
Curhan look a little sluggish at the start. Versatile backup tackle/guards rarely have the quickest feet on the team.
...................................................................................
All of the above players are clearly ether versatile/swing backups or first year develpmental projects. I didn't see any one of them play themselves out of their roles.
Last edited:
Yes I thought they pass protected better than they run blocked... We have not seen much of the ones. I just think it's something they need to work on.
