I was under the impression that the reason he's been traded for peanuts twice in the past year is because of exorbitant demands on his next contract. Teams were understandably hesitant to trade significant capital for a guy with one year left on his current deal when they know that their best offer could very well not get an extension done. It's further complicated because you can't just franchise tag Jones. Since LBs are all lumped together under the tag, regardless of what LB position they play, tagging Jones means you're paying him $4 million more next season than the current highest-paid MLB actually gets. I'm sure he and his agent are aware of the leverage he has in Seattle. Those of you who think we're getting him back on a "reasonable" contract are delusional. If we get him back, it's because we offered more money than anyone else would.
I havn't heard anything negative about his character though. Regardless, I think going after fans on social media like this is a bad look. If there were rampant rumors circulating that he's a bad teammate, I'd understand the need to put out a general statement defending himself, but this was what, one fan maybe? This is kind of a Streisand Effect thing where the vast majority of us didn't even realize his character was remotely in question by anyone. I shudder to think of the kind of the thin-skinned reaction he might have when he inevitably has a few bad games at some point and the dogs REALLY come after him.