b8rtm8nn
Member
hawksfansinceday1":1iidb8dv said:Disagree. We'll see over the next couple of years how it shakes out but I like Rawls every bit as much as Gurley and more than Johnson. I think he has elite vision and very, very good quickness and cutting ability. Reminds me if a tough Shawn Alexander.ringless":1iidb8dv said:I would take Gurley over any RB in the division. Lynch is done. He is old, and has been struggling with injuries weekly since last year.
Rawls is an unknown. There have been some huge holes opened for him. He didn't play much in college because they didn't consider him that good. He might be, but there just isn't enough information yet.
Gurley is a proven in college. He is young, and he likely wasn't 100%, but even if he was he did very well behind a very bad o-line.
David Johnson will likely be the 2nd best back in the division moving forward. But the gap between him and Gurley is likely to be significant.
I figured most Seahawks would want to take Rawls over Gurley based on how the Seahawks use their running backs - I was surprised FlyHawksFly went the other way. Hopefully all four young RBs will be relatively healthy for the next few years and we can have some comparables - that would be a new experience for me as a Cards fan.