IndyHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 9,003
- Reaction score
- 2,662
I'll just say what seperates Tiger/Jack from the rest is simply the mind in high pressure golf...Sgt. Largent":k4ag47hc said:IndyHawk":k4ag47hc said:My dad had a set of Jacks clubs(ones from golf store) I still have one fromTreeRon":k4ag47hc said:Like I said go play a round with 1950's-60's forged MacGregors (or another club of that era) and then imagine 5'7" 140# Ben Hogan bending shots around trees and playing into 40 mph Texas windstorms.
I urge any of you guys that are really into golf, find some of those old clubs and play with them. At least take them to the range. They will be a test of your prowess. Then take those clubs and an old canvas bag and put them in your den or office and add them to your golf "collection".
that set..The "white fang"putter..I can't use that style but fun to look at.
I have used old woods and irons..When you hit them the feel is not the same
as these oversized ones today but Jack and Arnold were hitting old style balls
over 300 using the old woods..Imagine what they could have done today in their
primes..Yep this why I say any era..
Nicklaus averaged 276 off the tee, and yes he'd be right there with everyone else today, over 300 yards off the tee.
Again, I'm confused with what you guys are saying. If everyone's using the same technology, I don't get the advantage any one golfer has over another. So to say "well if Nicklaus had the ball and equipment he'd be EVEN better!"
Makes no sense, cause Tiger and every other insanely talented golfer today is using the same tech. There is no advantage.
There are shots that they can/could do that others cannot..One example is Tigers 5 wood
out of a fairway bunker that goes 250 yrds..I'll leave the era equipment out of this.