chris98251
Well-known member
Maybe Greg Williams will call the plays on offense also and take out teams best defenders to even the playing field.
Coach Cheap Shot yet again pointing the finger of blame at anyone and everyone he can to take the spotlight off his own shit coaching.b8rtm8nn":14xlesaz said:Rams fired their OC today,......
hawksfansinceday1":3k7z8wuz said:Coach Cheap Shot yet again pointing the finger of blame at anyone and everyone he can to take the spotlight off his own shit coaching.b8rtm8nn":3k7z8wuz said:Rams fired their OC today,......
Despite saying otherwise, I think Kroenke will fire his worthless ass at season's end. He needs to sell tix in L.A. and keeping Mr. Rules Committee won't do it. Too bad for the Hawks, Cards and 9ers. Be happy to be wrong. It's worth that Hawks' loss in St. Louis some years to insure they remain less than mediocre.
Ramfan128":1i2s09wm said:On top of that: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/9571 ... ge/page/14
Our all time winning % is higher....just for those that want to talk about how the Seahawks haven't been around as long. No matter how you slice it, neither the Cardinals nor the Seahawks franchises have ANYTHING on the Rams....not One. Single. Thing.
Ramfan128":1euul9uf said:Feel free to bash Fisher.
Feel free to bash the Rams this season.
But let's not get carried away historically here...
http://nflspinzone.com/2014/08/14/stati ... greatness/
We're 9th. The Seahawks and Cardinals are tied for 20th. The Rams have been suffering for around 20 years now....but that's really just a stretch that most teams go through. The Cardinals and Seahawks were irrelevant from the time of their birth until the early/mid 2000s. Neither of you had ever been to a super bowl. Playoff wins prior to 2000s? Not many.
On top of that: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/9571 ... ge/page/14
Our all time winning % is higher....just for those that want to talk about how the Seahawks haven't been around as long. No matter how you slice it, neither the Cardinals nor the Seahawks franchises have ANYTHING on the Rams....not One. Single. Thing.
So bash Fisher...that's fine. He should be fired. Bash St. Louis...whatever. We suck this year. We've been bad for a few years now.
But don't bring up history....because it doesn't look favorable on Seattle or Arizona in any way. I'd think that if any fanbases know what we're going through right now, it'd be you guys.
And before I get accused of bringing up the past like Niner fans do....the original post said "going back to 1990"...that's history, so I brought up some more history.
Feel free to bash me too...I was wrong. I thought the Cardinals wouldn't be good. Thought the Rams would be better. I was dead wrong. Now the Rams have to start over.
Marvin49":2cidghyn said:Ramfan128":2cidghyn said:Feel free to bash Fisher.
Feel free to bash the Rams this season.
But let's not get carried away historically here...
http://nflspinzone.com/2014/08/14/stati ... greatness/
We're 9th. The Seahawks and Cardinals are tied for 20th. The Rams have been suffering for around 20 years now....but that's really just a stretch that most teams go through. The Cardinals and Seahawks were irrelevant from the time of their birth until the early/mid 2000s. Neither of you had ever been to a super bowl. Playoff wins prior to 2000s? Not many.
On top of that: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/9571 ... ge/page/14
Our all time winning % is higher....just for those that want to talk about how the Seahawks haven't been around as long. No matter how you slice it, neither the Cardinals nor the Seahawks franchises have ANYTHING on the Rams....not One. Single. Thing.
So bash Fisher...that's fine. He should be fired. Bash St. Louis...whatever. We suck this year. We've been bad for a few years now.
But don't bring up history....because it doesn't look favorable on Seattle or Arizona in any way. I'd think that if any fanbases know what we're going through right now, it'd be you guys.
And before I get accused of bringing up the past like Niner fans do....the original post said "going back to 1990"...that's history, so I brought up some more history.
Feel free to bash me too...I was wrong. I thought the Cardinals wouldn't be good. Thought the Rams would be better. I was dead wrong. Now the Rams have to start over.
Seriously?
Sooooo.......
If I point out the 6th ranking and 5 rings does that make me the winner of the argument?
Come on dude....It's lame when teams with successful histories claim them in this type of argument....but a team with one ring and a whole lotta losing? Don't give me the "before I get accused" argument...you did exactly what Niner fans are constantly accused (and often are guilty) of.
Please.
Only think that's pertinent is that even after one of the worst offseasons in NFL history the 49ers have the same record as the your Rams who were supposed to have a powerhouse of a roster.
Seriously?
Sooooo.......
If I point out the 6th ranking and 5 rings does that make me the winner of the argument?
Come on dude....It's lame when teams with successful histories claim them in this type of argument....but a team with one ring and a whole lotta losing? Don't give me the "before I get accused" argument...you did exactly what Niner fans are constantly accused (and often are guilty) of.
Please.
Only think that's pertinent is that even after one of the worst offseasons in NFL history the 49ers have the same record as the your Rams who were supposed to have a powerhouse of a roster.
ilikedlargent":mb0sawdm said:Seriously?
Sooooo.......
If I point out the 6th ranking and 5 rings does that make me the winner of the argument?
Come on dude....It's lame when teams with successful histories claim them in this type of argument....but a team with one ring and a whole lotta losing? Don't give me the "before I get accused" argument...you did exactly what Niner fans are constantly accused (and often are guilty) of.
Please.
Only think that's pertinent is that even after one of the worst offseasons in NFL history the 49ers have the same record as the your Rams who were supposed to have a powerhouse of a roster.
actually,the Rams have 3 Championships won and have been to 7 Championship games.
the world didnt start in 1965.
Maulbert":25nn5943 said:ilikedlargent":25nn5943 said:Seriously?
Sooooo.......
If I point out the 6th ranking and 5 rings does that make me the winner of the argument?
Come on dude....It's lame when teams with successful histories claim them in this type of argument....but a team with one ring and a whole lotta losing? Don't give me the "before I get accused" argument...you did exactly what Niner fans are constantly accused (and often are guilty) of.
Please.
Only think that's pertinent is that even after one of the worst offseasons in NFL history the 49ers have the same record as the your Rams who were supposed to have a powerhouse of a roster.
actually,the Rams have 3 Championships won and have been to 7 Championship games.
the world didnt start in 1965.
No one gives a $#/? about the Cleveland Rams winning a title in 1945, Correcty McCorrecterson.
No one gives a $#/? about the Cleveland Rams winning a title in 1945, Correcty McCorrecterson.
Maulbert":3fkb8fig said:Marvin49":3fkb8fig said:Ramfan128":3fkb8fig said:Feel free to bash Fisher.
Feel free to bash the Rams this season.
But let's not get carried away historically here...
http://nflspinzone.com/2014/08/14/stati ... greatness/
We're 9th. The Seahawks and Cardinals are tied for 20th. The Rams have been suffering for around 20 years now....but that's really just a stretch that most teams go through. The Cardinals and Seahawks were irrelevant from the time of their birth until the early/mid 2000s. Neither of you had ever been to a super bowl. Playoff wins prior to 2000s? Not many.
On top of that: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/9571 ... ge/page/14
Our all time winning % is higher....just for those that want to talk about how the Seahawks haven't been around as long. No matter how you slice it, neither the Cardinals nor the Seahawks franchises have ANYTHING on the Rams....not One. Single. Thing.
So bash Fisher...that's fine. He should be fired. Bash St. Louis...whatever. We suck this year. We've been bad for a few years now.
But don't bring up history....because it doesn't look favorable on Seattle or Arizona in any way. I'd think that if any fanbases know what we're going through right now, it'd be you guys.
And before I get accused of bringing up the past like Niner fans do....the original post said "going back to 1990"...that's history, so I brought up some more history.
Feel free to bash me too...I was wrong. I thought the Cardinals wouldn't be good. Thought the Rams would be better. I was dead wrong. Now the Rams have to start over.
Seriously?
Sooooo.......
If I point out the 6th ranking and 5 rings does that make me the winner of the argument?
Come on dude....It's lame when teams with successful histories claim them in this type of argument....but a team with one ring and a whole lotta losing? Don't give me the "before I get accused" argument...you did exactly what Niner fans are constantly accused (and often are guilty) of.
Please.
Only think that's pertinent is that even after one of the worst offseasons in NFL history the 49ers have the same record as the your Rams who were supposed to have a powerhouse of a roster.
I...agree...with...Marvin....
What the hell just happened?
ilikedlargent":z215wj72 said:No one gives a $#/? about the Cleveland Rams winning a title in 1945, Correcty McCorrecterson.
not caring doesnt make the fact go away
ilikedlargent":2xvs9hie said:No one gives a $#/? about the Cleveland Rams winning a title in 1945, Correcty McCorrecterson.
not caring doesnt make the fact go away
Marvin49":2vwnpm8a said:ilikedlargent":2vwnpm8a said:No one gives a $#/? about the Cleveland Rams winning a title in 1945, Correcty McCorrecterson.
not caring doesnt make the fact go away
No but it doesn't make me care any more either.
Rams have ONE Lombardi trophy. 49ers have FIVE Lombardi trophies.
NEITHER matters a whoop.
Ramfan128":1wo3dbf4 said:hawksfansinceday1":1wo3dbf4 said:Coach Cheap Shot yet again pointing the finger of blame at anyone and everyone he can to take the spotlight off his own shit coaching.b8rtm8nn":1wo3dbf4 said:Rams fired their OC today,......
Despite saying otherwise, I think Kroenke will fire his worthless ass at season's end. He needs to sell tix in L.A. and keeping Mr. Rules Committee won't do it. Too bad for the Hawks, Cards and 9ers. Be happy to be wrong. It's worth that Hawks' loss in St. Louis some years to insure they remain less than mediocre.
But the OC clearly wasn't doing a good job either.
Marvin49":27rit7td said:Ramfan128":27rit7td said:Feel free to bash Fisher.
Feel free to bash the Rams this season.
But let's not get carried away historically here...
http://nflspinzone.com/2014/08/14/stati ... greatness/
We're 9th. The Seahawks and Cardinals are tied for 20th. The Rams have been suffering for around 20 years now....but that's really just a stretch that most teams go through. The Cardinals and Seahawks were irrelevant from the time of their birth until the early/mid 2000s. Neither of you had ever been to a super bowl. Playoff wins prior to 2000s? Not many.
On top of that: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/9571 ... ge/page/14
Our all time winning % is higher....just for those that want to talk about how the Seahawks haven't been around as long. No matter how you slice it, neither the Cardinals nor the Seahawks franchises have ANYTHING on the Rams....not One. Single. Thing.
So bash Fisher...that's fine. He should be fired. Bash St. Louis...whatever. We suck this year. We've been bad for a few years now.
But don't bring up history....because it doesn't look favorable on Seattle or Arizona in any way. I'd think that if any fanbases know what we're going through right now, it'd be you guys.
And before I get accused of bringing up the past like Niner fans do....the original post said "going back to 1990"...that's history, so I brought up some more history.
Feel free to bash me too...I was wrong. I thought the Cardinals wouldn't be good. Thought the Rams would be better. I was dead wrong. Now the Rams have to start over.
Seriously?
Sooooo.......
If I point out the 6th ranking and 5 rings does that make me the winner of the argument?
Come on dude....It's lame when teams with successful histories claim them in this type of argument....but a team with one ring and a whole lotta losing? Don't give me the "before I get accused" argument...you did exactly what Niner fans are constantly accused (and often are guilty) of.
Please.
Only thing that's pertinent is that even after one of the worst offseasons in NFL history the 49ers have the same record as the your Rams who were supposed to have a powerhouse of a roster.