suppaball
Well-known member
For no particular reason I'm going with Jeffcoat. For no particular reason.
suppaball":3hhdexqm said:For no particular reason I'm going with Jeffcoat. For no particular reason.
I think he will be a good addition.Sgt. Largent":3hn8qdqb said:suppaball":3hn8qdqb said:For no particular reason I'm going with Jeffcoat. For no particular reason.
I know Jeffcoat was a "tweener," and teams hate tweeners.........but I'm still surprised he fell all the way out of the draft. What with his pedigree and stats.
It'll be interesting to see if we develop him into a speedy pass rushing DE, or into another LEO to compete with Bruce.
Whoa, that's high praise indeed.kearly":dsx0ut3q said:..........
I think three years from now the best pick from this draft will be Pierre-Lewis. League average player feels like his floor, all-pro his ceiling. Just a crazy good athlete who's smart, articulate, and seems like the kind of guy that would take quickly to coaching. Anybody that Luke Kuechly looked at as a peer is worth paying attention to.
...............
TeamoftheCentury":yyze07nb said:Not exactly sure about the significance of this "adopt a rookie" thing. I've seen it before, but I don't quite get what this accomplishes. Is this another "look how smart I am" opportunity?![]()
Well, seems like picking from among the draft picks is a reasonable idea to bank on them having a pretty good shot. But, I projected a guy to the Hawks from Southern U (in the draft contest) who was an under the radar small school prospect and he's sticking around as an UDFA tryout player. His "Pro Day" piggybacked off the LSU Pro Day through flyers placed on scouts wind-shields.
I'm liking the story that is developing about TE Rashaun Allen. Already has accomplished something as one of the tryout players to have been signed for a longer look. So, somebody has to "have his back" - whatever that means from a computer keyboard. So, I'll go with a long shot: the kid from Cleveland.
Ok, kid. Make me look smart. (Wait, I got you're back.) Am I understanding this thing now? lol.
lol. Man, that's too bad. No foolin' anyone otherwise.Scottemojo":27qhsdmi said:TeamoftheCentury":27qhsdmi said:Not exactly sure about the significance of this "adopt a rookie" thing. I've seen it before, but I don't quite get what this accomplishes. Is this another "look how smart I am" opportunity?![]()
Well, seems like picking from among the draft picks is a reasonable idea to bank on them having a pretty good shot. But, I projected a guy to the Hawks from Southern U (in the draft contest) who was an under the radar small school prospect and he's sticking around as an UDFA tryout player. His "Pro Day" piggybacked off the LSU Pro Day through flyers placed on scouts wind-shields.
I'm liking the story that is developing about TE Rashaun Allen. Already has accomplished something as one of the tryout players to have been signed for a longer look. So, somebody has to "have his back" - whatever that means from a computer keyboard. So, I'll go with a long shot: the kid from Cleveland.
Ok, kid. Make me look smart. (Wait, I got you're back.) Am I understanding this thing now? lol.
No, you are not getting it. You don't adopt so you look smart, you adopt for sentimentality. Bias. Idiocy. You like his college. You think his mom is hot. He is a dick, and so am I (which is why I took Marsh).
But definitely not to look smart.