Terrion Arnold arrested

[IndyHawk]

So, somehow that means anything? Milroe has never been in trouble with the law. EVER.

Arnold was never in trouble with the law either before present case.

 

[glenwo2]

So was OJ Simpson

If the glove fit, you must acquit.

 

[Trackhawk]

Arnold was never in trouble with the law either before present case.

 

[IndyHawk]

View attachment 80711

Public record shows zero.

 

[Trackhawk]

Public record shows zero.

As do my public records.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[IndyHawk]

As do my public records.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

So, the way you're thinking (assuming here), the minor records
are sealed like his, yours and Milroes possibly.
I'm not defending Arnold btw, I was making a point, I think you
got t.

 

[Seak]

Surprised the chiefs didn't pick him up on waivers lol

 

[Azvacar]

View attachment 80711

Someone doesnt grasp how the Government works at all.. or... the internet... Perfect picture of how i Imagine you saying this. Are you 80? Welcome to basic public records for everyone in your county, city.... state .. if you grasp how to use the internet

 

[Azvacar]

Public record shows zero.

The response to track hawk is to you as well.. Im not sure if you are literally inept at basic life.. or the internet in general


Im 45, you must be 80..

 

[Rat]

Agent testifies that Colts, Jets, Seahawks, and Texans have inquired about Terrion Arnold

Nicole Lynn said Arnold recently worked out for the Texans.

www.nbcsports.com

His agent is claiming the Seahawks are one of four teams that have inquired into him.

 

[Rat]

Milroe does have a history of not abiding with the law. There's impersonating an NFL QB, extorting an NFL team into drafting him... probably several others.

 

[Trackhawk]

Someone doesnt grasp how the Government works at all.. or... the internet... Perfect picture of how i Imagine you saying this. Are you 80? Welcome to basic public records for everyone in your county, city.... state .. if you grasp how to use the internet

Not entirely sure what your point is.

Are you saying that, since we now have unprecedented access to public records, the fact that someone can't find a public record of run ins with the law is proof that run ins never occurred? If so, you might want to consider the history of how southern law enforcement deals with four-star athletic prospects, and how things get swept under the rug for them.

Absence of public record evidence may be evidence of innocence, but it certainly isn't proof of it. When I previously held a government job, with NCIC access, it became pretty obvious that not everything is available in the public record.

All I'm really saying is that it would be incredibly odd and unlikely for someone to jump directly from 23 years of being a perfect normal, law abiding citizen to going out and orchestrating full on armed kidnapping, battery, and robbery, and the fact that we can't find priors in the public record is not proof that there are not priors.

 

[IndyHawk]

Not entirely sure what your point is.

Are you saying that, since we now have unprecedented access to public records, the fact that someone can't find a public record of run ins with the law is proof that run ins never occurred? If so, you might want to consider the history of how southern law enforcement deals with four-star athletic prospects, and how things get swept under the rug for them.

Absence of public record evidence may be evidence of innocence, but it certainly isn't proof of it. When I previously held a government job, with NCIC access, it became pretty obvious that not everything is available in the public record.

All I'm really saying is that it would be incredibly odd and unlikely for someone to jump directly from 23 years of being a perfect normal, law abiding citizen to going out and orchestrating full on armed kidnapping, battery, and robbery, and the fact that we can't find priors in the public record is not proof that there are not priors.

I don't know what his point is, he hasn't educated me one bit in anything to do
with court/public records.

 

[Seak]

Not entirely sure what your point is.

Are you saying that, since we now have unprecedented access to public records, the fact that someone can't find a public record of run ins with the law is proof that run ins never occurred? If so, you might want to consider the history of how southern law enforcement deals with four-star athletic prospects, and how things get swept under the rug for them.

Absence of public record evidence may be evidence of innocence, but it certainly isn't proof of it. When I previously held a government job, with NCIC access, it became pretty obvious that not everything is available in the public record.

All I'm really saying is that it would be incredibly odd and unlikely for someone to jump directly from 23 years of being a perfect normal, law abiding citizen to going out and orchestrating full on armed kidnapping, battery, and robbery, and the fact that we can't find priors in the public record is not proof that there are not priors.

Agreed, I actually dont know a hell of a lot how law/public records go . but i definitely got something from way back in the day that no can find (knucklehead young kid stuff)