Teams That Spend the Most...Seahawks Not One.

SeaWolv

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,886
Reaction score
1,233

soxhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
536
Location
Back in Seattle.
Yeah, if you're fighting to play in the Owl, you spend like Baltimore, Buffal, and GB did. If not, you wait.
 

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,210
Reaction score
2,251
wait for what?
Maybe the GM is waiting to get fired and the owner is just wanting to make a profit before selling? She just sold the blazers. Otherwise, it makes no sense to wait. If you want to win, you spend money to make it happen.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
14,790
Reaction score
10,393
Location
SoCal Desert
Maybe the GM is waiting to get fired and the owner is just wanting to make a profit before selling? She just sold the blazers. Otherwise, it makes no sense to wait. If you want to win, you spend money to make it happen.
I agree with you, hence the "wait for what".
 

soxhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
536
Location
Back in Seattle.
We just spent the last decade and will spend again when the pieces are in place. We're just not there yet, apparently. Maybe once we find our QBOTF?
 

Dolomight12

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
11,638
Reaction score
7,669
Location
The Land of Spoiled Milk and Honey Traps
Maybe the GM is waiting to get fired and the owner is just wanting to make a profit before selling? She just sold the blazers. Otherwise, it makes no sense to wait. If you want to win, you spend money to make it happen.
That sounds GREAT in theory. But it's exponentially more difficult to do EFFECTIVELY in practice. Championship roster construction is a science of balance, leveraging your youth/rookie contracts and nabbing the RIGHT "splash" players for your system, and a bunch of other details that have probably already been mentioned in the comments in here that I have yet to read.
 
N

NoGain

Guest
I was all for taking a 3rd/4th round shot on Milroe based upon his character and athletic abilities. But I had no illusions about the possibility of him never amounting to something resembling a franchise QB, let alone a competent starting QB. He doesn't know how to QB yet, at least not near the necessary level for an NFL QB. That was pretty clear in his final season at Bama. Milroe is and was a developmental shot from the very beginning, a shot worth taking to me. If the light bulb goes on, if he's got in him, great, we hit the lottery. If it doesn't, if it's not in him, so be it. We gave it a shot. No great tragedy if a 3rd round pick doesn't hit.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
14,790
Reaction score
10,393
Location
SoCal Desert
If we don't win the second game tomorrow, which we are gonna win, we should start playing Milroe in game 3. In the next 4 games, let him start playing a quarter, then two, before he starts in our game 6 or 7.

Why game 3? It's an easy win against a messed-up team, and if we don't win tomorrow, we have about 6% chance to enter the playoffs if we trust historical stats.
 

Trackhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2025
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
1,798
Slow grow if he ain't playing.

Many of the best QBs, including in the salary cap era, have sat for a year, honing their craft, before being exposed to NFL defenses, who can irreparably shatter a young QBs confidence.

Brady
Mahomes
Rodgers

We used to develop QBs instead of throwing them in the deep end to sink or swim.

Is it any wonder so many sink now?

Let Milroe develop, and don’t rush to get him on the field IMHO.
 
Top