MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 18,570
- Reaction score
- 1,494
Uh-oh. I've been told to "shut up now". Guess I'd better shut up now.
:roll:
:roll:
Seahwkgal":1oo1za56 said:Lane broke his arm. Just wanted to correct the info...THE TABS":1oo1za56 said:Seanhawk":1oo1za56 said:But, but, what about the 10 point lead you gave up? That was the question.
Coming into that game, Kam was playing with a torn MCL, Sherm was playing with a hyperextended elbow, and Earl was playing with a torn labrum. In the cases of Sherm and Earl, they were both playing with one arm tied behind their backs. They both missed a lot of tackles that day that they normally wouldn’t have missed.
Also, Jeremy Lane blew out his knee in the first quarter, and Tharold Simon also went down in the third. By the time the fourth quarter came around, our secondary was an absolute mess, and Tom Brady took full advantage. THAT’S why we blew that lead.
As for the interception, there’s this; the way the Pats defense was aligned, RW walks in for a touchdown if we call read option on that play, AND, what hurts the most about that play to this day, NE had two time outs and did not use them, meaning that they were getting ready to CONCEDE THE TOUCHDOWN.
That’s what hurts the most about that day.
Scorpion05":1ioy3wtg said:WmHBonney":1ioy3wtg said:Scorpion05":1ioy3wtg said:I don’t care what anyone says. The only ones who keep this false narrative going are pundits like Screamin’ A and others. It was a good play call that got undone by a better reaction from Butler. If Butler is even an inch late on that, we win. The ball was on target, everything looked fine. Butler made a GREAT play. If we’re gonna nitpick at anything, it’s maybe that Kearse didn’t pull off the rub, and Lockette was too lackadaisical going to the ball as if it was a given
WRONG.
Worst play call since Pickett's charge at Gettysburg.
Cute, but not a valid counter
Most of the criticism of that play is rooted in hindsight. Had Lynch fumbled, or had something gone catastrophic, the criticism would be why did Pete not trust his QB and waste a time out
The criticism is rarely, if ever rooted on actual analysis of the play. Butler made an amazing play that 99% of defenders wouldn't have the instincts to make in that situation
Scorpion05":1ie5wwh6 said:Sox-n-Hawks":1ie5wwh6 said:Scorpion05":1ie5wwh6 said:WmHBonney":1ie5wwh6 said:WRONG.
Worst play call since Pickett's charge at Gettysburg.
Cute, but not a valid counter
Most of the criticism of that play is rooted in hindsight. Had Lynch fumbled, or had something gone catastrophic, the criticism would be why did Pete not trust his QB and waste a time out
The criticism is rarely, if ever rooted on actual analysis of the play. Butler made an amazing play that 99% of defenders wouldn't have the instincts to make in that situation
Because Lynch was SO prone to fumble right? I’m not going to waste time running the numbers, but I’d be willing to bet based on pure odds Wilson was more likely to throw an incomplete pass or INT than Lynch fumbling. Great film study by a young DB against a PREDICTABLE playcaller paid dividends.
Not really. I mean, he did almost lose the ball to the Panthers 2 weeks before that, but we won that game easily. Lynch is no more likey to turn it over than our QB, who's known for 4th Quarter heroics and had only thrown an interception 7 times all year. Pete had gone with Wilson in several goal line or 4th down situations, and succeeded. If you don't have a QB that's done that for you several times, then you end up like the Jaguars and Vikings did today
Lynch was also not known for converting those situations often that year. If Lynch doesn't get it, it's poor clock management. We see teams lose all the time for overly safe playcalling, Pete went for the jugular
There were 26 seconds left in the game and it was second down. An incompletion is not nearly as bad as an interception in that situation. The interception ended the game. An incompletion would have just meant another attempt to score. Lets think before we type.Sox-n-Hawks":3l59d6ks said:Scorpion05":3l59d6ks said:Sox-n-Hawks":3l59d6ks said:Scorpion05":3l59d6ks said:Cute, but not a valid counter
Most of the criticism of that play is rooted in hindsight. Had Lynch fumbled, or had something gone catastrophic, the criticism would be why did Pete not trust his QB and waste a time out
The criticism is rarely, if ever rooted on actual analysis of the play. Butler made an amazing play that 99% of defenders wouldn't have the instincts to make in that situation
Because Lynch was SO prone to fumble right? I’m not going to waste time running the numbers, but I’d be willing to bet based on pure odds Wilson was more likely to throw an incomplete pass or INT than Lynch fumbling. Great film study by a young DB against a PREDICTABLE playcaller paid dividends.
Not really. I mean, he did almost lose the ball to the Panthers 2 weeks before that, but we won that game easily. Lynch is no more likey to turn it over than our QB, who's known for 4th Quarter heroics and had only thrown an interception 7 times all year. Pete had gone with Wilson in several goal line or 4th down situations, and succeeded. If you don't have a QB that's done that for you several times, then you end up like the Jaguars and Vikings did today
Lynch was also not known for converting those situations often that year. If Lynch doesn't get it, it's poor clock management. We see teams lose all the time for overly safe playcalling, Pete went for the jugular
FYI icompletions are as bad as interceptions in that situation.
Constantly using the next man up always compete mantras as the rational for firing DB following this play-call is absurd. Players lose contain, miss assignments, miss tackles, fumble, and throw interceptions, that doesn't mean they get benched or cut. If you feel DB should have been fired for the play fine; that is a valid opinion held by many on here. However, don't twist Pete's philosophy to fit a narrow minded agenda driven narrative.XxXdragonXxX":1xdyu9m3 said:Scorpion05":1xdyu9m3 said:WmHBonney":1xdyu9m3 said:Scorpion05":1xdyu9m3 said:I don’t care what anyone says. The only ones who keep this false narrative going are pundits like Screamin’ A and others. It was a good play call that got undone by a better reaction from Butler. If Butler is even an inch late on that, we win. The ball was on target, everything looked fine. Butler made a GREAT play. If we’re gonna nitpick at anything, it’s maybe that Kearse didn’t pull off the rub, and Lockette was too lackadaisical going to the ball as if it was a given
WRONG.
Worst play call since Pickett's charge at Gettysburg.
Cute, but not a valid counter
Most of the criticism of that play is rooted in hindsight. Had Lynch fumbled, or had something gone catastrophic, the criticism would be why did Pete not trust his QB and waste a time out
The criticism is rarely, if ever rooted on actual analysis of the play. Butler made an amazing play that 99% of defenders wouldn't have the instincts to make in that situation
Fact of the matter is that throwing the ball, which was Pete's call, was a good call. The particular play that was called, which was called by Bevell, was TERRIBLE. The pats brought in their big package. We threw a quick slant right into that big pckage that relied on RICARDO FREAKING LOCKETTE to make the play, and Kearse to shield out BRANDON FREKING BROWNER.
The team never recovered, there was no fallout from the call. No closure. The players who are held to the next man up and compete mantras, watched their failure of an OC keep his job and continue to be a failure.
The players HAVE TO say that publicly, even if they know its BS.Wenhawk":smdvcrij said:The problems ran deep, anyone remember the Baldwin quote at the end of the season?
In a recent Article about the Solari Hire (It's a goood read) Walter Jones had some interesting comments.
Jones said he agreed with what receiver Doug Baldwin said after the season that it wasn’t so much the coaching but just the players not executing.
“It’s all about the players,’’ Jones said. “I think the players have to refocus and kind of decide on what type of team they want to be. So they have to put that focus on themselves.’’
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/sea ... ome-clues/
SPOHAWK":my0q2pt8 said:Did Bennett play this year? Not much production! New slogan for him should be stand up, shut up and play!
Sun Tzu":1077jq26 said:There were 26 seconds left in the game and it was second down. An incompletion is not nearly as bad as an interception in that situation. The interception ended the game. An incompletion would have just meant another attempt to score. Lets think before we type.Sox-n-Hawks":1077jq26 said:Scorpion05":1077jq26 said:Sox-n-Hawks":1077jq26 said:Because Lynch was SO prone to fumble right? I’m not going to waste time running the numbers, but I’d be willing to bet based on pure odds Wilson was more likely to throw an incomplete pass or INT than Lynch fumbling. Great film study by a young DB against a PREDICTABLE playcaller paid dividends.
Not really. I mean, he did almost lose the ball to the Panthers 2 weeks before that, but we won that game easily. Lynch is no more likey to turn it over than our QB, who's known for 4th Quarter heroics and had only thrown an interception 7 times all year. Pete had gone with Wilson in several goal line or 4th down situations, and succeeded. If you don't have a QB that's done that for you several times, then you end up like the Jaguars and Vikings did today
Lynch was also not known for converting those situations often that year. If Lynch doesn't get it, it's poor clock management. We see teams lose all the time for overly safe playcalling, Pete went for the jugular
FYI icompletions are as bad as interceptions in that situation.
Sox-n-Hawks":8gq14sa6 said:Sun Tzu":8gq14sa6 said:There were 26 seconds left in the game and it was second down. An incompletion is not nearly as bad as an interception in that situation. The interception ended the game. An incompletion would have just meant another attempt to score. Lets think before we type.Sox-n-Hawks":8gq14sa6 said:Scorpion05":8gq14sa6 said:Not really. I mean, he did almost lose the ball to the Panthers 2 weeks before that, but we won that game easily. Lynch is no more likey to turn it over than our QB, who's known for 4th Quarter heroics and had only thrown an interception 7 times all year. Pete had gone with Wilson in several goal line or 4th down situations, and succeeded. If you don't have a QB that's done that for you several times, then you end up like the Jaguars and Vikings did today
Lynch was also not known for converting those situations often that year. If Lynch doesn't get it, it's poor clock management. We see teams lose all the time for overly safe playcalling, Pete went for the jugular
FYI icompletions are as bad as interceptions in that situation.
Actually, an incompletion stops the clock, allows the defense to re-set and prepare for a Lynch run. It's been discussed at nauseam on here.
brimsalabim":1gashpzy said:Nope. You fail to get it. Regardless of how Bennett feels about the play the issue is that he continues to make it a distraction and there for a problem for the team. He and anyone else distracting from the team goal need to go. Either with us or against us.