Scorpion05
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,722
- Reaction score
- 10
northseahawk":1d1x9z6u said:Smellyman":1d1x9z6u said:Scorpion05":1d1x9z6u said:northseahawk":1d1x9z6u said:I dont think this upgrade will make any difference blocking for a qb that runs wild all over. It's impossible to block efficiently for a qb that runs east/west.
Not sure if trolling, but if Watson or Rodgers can have a good O-line, so can Russell
Going w/ trolling
I guess it won't be long till next Sunday where we see if i am trolling or suddenly we have a conventional pocket qb in Wilson.
I am telling you right now, if it's Brown or Walter Jones, it's just not possible to block effectively for a guy that runs side to side rather than up into the pocket.
And by the way, i guess you hadn't seen Rodgers oline this year. He would have drooled for our line than his!
I'm sorry but this is not a reasonable opinion
First, he's new to the team. It may take a couple of games to get fully adjusted to our style
Second, my point was that Watson runs around, Aaron Rodgers runs around. Carson Wentz runs around. Why you decided to single out Russell Wilson(your QB..I think) as somehow the ONLY Qb that runs around, as if advanced stats hasn't PROVEN the O-line is poor, is absurd. I simply don't get the negativity. Constructive criticism is one thing, but what possessed you to make that kind of comment as if a mobile QB with a great O-line(Aaron Rodgers, Carson Wentz, etc.) is unheard of?? Btw, I make it a habit to watch games around the league, so I've seen Packers games. His line is solid, and has been great before. Didn't stop him from running around
And why are you pretending as if Russell isn't pressured the most under 3 seconds, forcing him to run or see ghosts? I simply don't get the lack of fairness and reason. It's mind boggling, honestly