Should a murderer be HOF eligible?

OP
OP
Cyrus12

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
19,785
Reaction score
6,538
Location
North of the Wall
I didn't watch the trial, the discussions after and written facts give a better view of the trial.
LA would of rioted again if OJ was found guilty. I think his defense team did a great job of steering the trial away from the actual murder. The prosecution team did a horrible job...probably more worried about their book deals and spots on cnn after the trial
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
3,908
Location
Kennewick, WA
Oj was found not guilty...the glove not fitting was all I needed to see.
Let's get the record straight and complete. OJ was found innocent of first-degree murder in the criminal trial and found responsible for the deaths in a civil trial. In addition, in a separate crime years later, OJ was found guilty of robbery and kidnapping and was sentenced to 33 years in jail and ended up serving 9 years.
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
1,823
Reaction score
1,426
Location
Bournemouth, UK
Should he already be in? Probably, but he's not, and if he hasn't been voted in within 60 years of his retirement he shouldn't get in. That should apply to every player. Most of the current HoF voters never saw him play, don't understand what the league of that time was like, or know what the rules were. Forming an opinion now is just re-hashing old opinions of other people and ultimately those other people chose not to put him in.
 

CouchLogic

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
1,068
Reaction score
1,404
This is America.

Criminals run the joint.

What's the issue here?
 

Latest posts

Top