Tical21
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 5,541
- Reaction score
- 82
Wait a second. I back the players 99% of the time in these arguments. I believe they shouldn't even have owners. But I don't get at all where Sherman is coming from.
Is he implying they should take the contracts they negotiated and agreed to, knowing full well that the preseason was part of the deal, and shred them? Then redo the contracts, automatically giving the players more money?
Or is he implying that they should lessen the amounts of the regular season game checks and spread the salary over 20 checks instead of 16?
Is he implying they should take the contracts they negotiated and agreed to, knowing full well that the preseason was part of the deal, and shred them? Then redo the contracts, automatically giving the players more money?
Or is he implying that they should lessen the amounts of the regular season game checks and spread the salary over 20 checks instead of 16?