JSeahawks
Well-known member
Especially at the top of the conference.
But damn, its boring to watch. Unless you really like punters.
But damn, its boring to watch. Unless you really like punters.
SarG3Hawk":2roo4oo8 said:They're good defensively, but their offenses are also very mediocre. I mean LSU's QB struggled vs North Texas in Baton Rouge. Aaron Murray is bleh, same story with the UF Qb.
Is the SEC really the best conference in college football "top to bottom," as it's so often described? And if it is, why since the start of the BCS era in 1998 does the conference have overall losing records against the Pac-12 (11-12) and Big East (19-23) and superior but not dominating records against other major conferences? Might the nationwide perception of SEC superiority simply be part of a well-constructed ESPN business plan meant to protect and enhance the network’s $2.25 billion partnership with the SEC?
taz291819":1xpolhdx said:SarG3Hawk":1xpolhdx said:They're good defensively, but their offenses are also very mediocre. I mean LSU's QB struggled vs North Texas in Baton Rouge. Aaron Murray is bleh, same story with the UF Qb.
Umm, South Carolina has the stout defense, but will also put some points on ya if need be.
JSeahawks":3glumabi said:Excellent write up on SEC bias:
Is the SEC really the best conference in college football "top to bottom," as it's so often described? And if it is, why since the start of the BCS era in 1998 does the conference have overall losing records against the Pac-12 (11-12) and Big East (19-23) and superior but not dominating records against other major conferences? Might the nationwide perception of SEC superiority simply be part of a well-constructed ESPN business plan meant to protect and enhance the network’s $2.25 billion partnership with the SEC?
http://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/2 ... on-sec-bcs