Shanegotyou11
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2017
- Messages
- 5,397
- Reaction score
- 390
We need another pass rusher and kendricks back. I think kj will be gone
EL if I know, alls I know is that I ain't been getting any......er.......never mind.Sac":3veyixb8 said:Dafuq has Poona been? That's what I wanna know.
hawknation2018":32meqbei said:Sac":32meqbei said:Dafuq has Poona been? That's what I wanna know.
He played 18 snaps.
The young defensive linemen didn’t play a lot in this game. 17 snaps for Martin. 10 for Green. For some reason, they’re not trusting the young guys to stop the run in base downs.
Clark played 56 snaps. Reed played 53, which seems like too many if you believe in the law of diminishing returns. Stephen played 41. Jordan 33. Jefferson 32. Mingo 30 (splitting time between SLB and LEO).
1. The O-Coaching has been working hard to try and get Wilson to play AWAY from his save the day plays.......Lots of trade-offs........Careful what you ask for.Sgt. Largent":22oirpcd said:Cyrus12":22oirpcd said:You guys do know this is a rebuild right? It cant ge done in one year with failed draft picks eg. The atv rider guy. For what they have on the roster right now they are doing better than I thought. Yes there are lots of holes and filler but its gonna take a couple years to build the d. Isnt this the year the offense was supposed to carry the team?
Rebuild doesn't mean we shouldn't expect things like;
1. Our franchise QB and his veteran offense to perform in the 4th quarter and not be 0-4 this year trying to win games late. Fumbles, sacks, killer penalties.........not good enough.
2. Our coaching staff to be more creative when things aren't working, especially on defense.
We all get that it's a rebuild year, but that doesn't excuse fixable things and better performance from your most experienced and talented players.
scutterhawk":3o0zqkyu said:1. The O-Coaching has been working hard to try and get Wilson to play AWAY from his save the day plays.......Lots of trade-offs........Careful what you ask for.Sgt. Largent":3o0zqkyu said:Cyrus12":3o0zqkyu said:You guys do know this is a rebuild right? It cant ge done in one year with failed draft picks eg. The atv rider guy. For what they have on the roster right now they are doing better than I thought. Yes there are lots of holes and filler but its gonna take a couple years to build the d. Isnt this the year the offense was supposed to carry the team?
Rebuild doesn't mean we shouldn't expect things like;
1. Our franchise QB and his veteran offense to perform in the 4th quarter and not be 0-4 this year trying to win games late. Fumbles, sacks, killer penalties.........not good enough.
2. Our coaching staff to be more creative when things aren't working, especially on defense.
We all get that it's a rebuild year, but that doesn't excuse fixable things and better performance from your most experienced and talented players.
Northwest Seahawk":2rnbtfj7 said:So were 9 games in and my take on them is this. There not good enough . Now that may sound simplistic but it's the truth.
We need a better pass rush, and what many of us thought was a strength LB looks very suspect against good teams.
Seattle has a couple things to fix. First we need a dominant lineman I don't care if it's at DE or DT but we need one. Second we need another really physical LB, fix those two things and I think they can maybe get to 10-6 9-7 next year.
If they are going to stay with Wilson and this offense there going to have to get better defensively were giving up to many points . Our secondary is decent but there having to cover for to long we need to get more pressure up front.
We knew the defense would take a step back and they did and it's the difference between us making the playoffs and going 7-9. Seattle has never been a great offense with Wilson at QB, but he is good enough to win with . Seattle has to have a great defense or the way the team is built doesn't work. Seattle simply isn't built to outscore teams never has been under Pete. Also tough schedule I mean it's just a tough year to try and retool and make the playoffs with this schedule.
LTH":3d4o7utl said:Northwest Seahawk":3d4o7utl said:So were 9 games in and my take on them is this. There not good enough . Now that may sound simplistic but it's the truth.
We need a better pass rush, and what many of us thought was a strength LB looks very suspect against good teams.
Seattle has a couple things to fix. First we need a dominant lineman I don't care if it's at DE or DT but we need one. Second we need another really physical LB, fix those two things and I think they can maybe get to 10-6 9-7 next year.
If they are going to stay with Wilson and this offense there going to have to get better defensively were giving up to many points . Our secondary is decent but there having to cover for to long we need to get more pressure up front.
We knew the defense would take a step back and they did and it's the difference between us making the playoffs and going 7-9. Seattle has never been a great offense with Wilson at QB, but he is good enough to win with . Seattle has to have a great defense or the way the team is built doesn't work. Seattle simply isn't built to outscore teams never has been under Pete. Also tough schedule I mean it's just a tough year to try and retool and make the playoffs with this schedule.
They stood toe to toe with the best Offense in football... They made the stops when they had to and put this team in position to win the damn game what more do you want from a D? This is crazy... if you match up the Rams O against the Hawks D they should just blow us out... but thats not what happened they played well enough to win the game...
LTH
Northwest Seahawk":1yq3h5sg said:LTH":1yq3h5sg said:Northwest Seahawk":1yq3h5sg said:So were 9 games in and my take on them is this. There not good enough . Now that may sound simplistic but it's the truth.
We need a better pass rush, and what many of us thought was a strength LB looks very suspect against good teams.
Seattle has a couple things to fix. First we need a dominant lineman I don't care if it's at DE or DT but we need one. Second we need another really physical LB, fix those two things and I think they can maybe get to 10-6 9-7 next year.
If they are going to stay with Wilson and this offense there going to have to get better defensively were giving up to many points . Our secondary is decent but there having to cover for to long we need to get more pressure up front.
We knew the defense would take a step back and they did and it's the difference between us making the playoffs and going 7-9. Seattle has never been a great offense with Wilson at QB, but he is good enough to win with . Seattle has to have a great defense or the way the team is built doesn't work. Seattle simply isn't built to outscore teams never has been under Pete. Also tough schedule I mean it's just a tough year to try and retool and make the playoffs with this schedule.
They stood toe to toe with the best Offense in football... They made the stops when they had to and put this team in position to win the damn game what more do you want from a D? This is crazy... if you match up the Rams O against the Hawks D they should just blow us out... but thats not what happened they played well enough to win the game...
LTH
Then we need a better QB because we rushed for a ton of yards and according to you the defense is just fine.
LTH":k7j7u0pq said:Northwest Seahawk":k7j7u0pq said:LTH":k7j7u0pq said:Northwest Seahawk":k7j7u0pq said:So were 9 games in and my take on them is this. There not good enough . Now that may sound simplistic but it's the truth.
We need a better pass rush, and what many of us thought was a strength LB looks very suspect against good teams.
Seattle has a couple things to fix. First we need a dominant lineman I don't care if it's at DE or DT but we need one. Second we need another really physical LB, fix those two things and I think they can maybe get to 10-6 9-7 next year.
If they are going to stay with Wilson and this offense there going to have to get better defensively were giving up to many points . Our secondary is decent but there having to cover for to long we need to get more pressure up front.
We knew the defense would take a step back and they did and it's the difference between us making the playoffs and going 7-9. Seattle has never been a great offense with Wilson at QB, but he is good enough to win with . Seattle has to have a great defense or the way the team is built doesn't work. Seattle simply isn't built to outscore teams never has been under Pete. Also tough schedule I mean it's just a tough year to try and retool and make the playoffs with this schedule.
They stood toe to toe with the best Offense in football... They made the stops when they had to and put this team in position to win the damn game what more do you want from a D? This is crazy... if you match up the Rams O against the Hawks D they should just blow us out... but thats not what happened they played well enough to win the game...
LTH
Then we need a better QB because we rushed for a ton of yards and according to you the defense is just fine.
I think the D is good enough to get us to the playoffs...and I think the O is good enough to get us to the play offs... I would say just relax a bit drink a beer and enjoy the game ... its going to get better...This is typical Seahawks its not like we were not in almost they exact same position in 2015..
LTH
knownone":7jfzry3u said:If you remove the 3 games against the #2 and #3 offenses we're a top 5 defense if you include them we're still 10th. The defense this season, despite a tougher schedule, is still on pace to be better than last seasons.
It's probably easier to make the argument that our offense is not good enough rather than our defense. I'm just saying, we have a better defense statistically than all but 3 teams with a better record than us the Bears, Texans, and Vikings.
I do agree that we need a better pass rush and some help at linebacker.
Attyla the Hawk":3ei13l6y said:It's worth revisiting the last time Pete rebuilt this defense in 2010.
That year he was lucky enough to start with his keystone position on defense: Earl Thomas
I would expect him to do the same now. Obviously I'd like to see them just resign Earl. He's worth the price whatever he gets. And there isn't an edge player who is as good at rushing the passer, as Earl is as good at being a game altering safety.
Failing that -- I think we're going to start at FS. Seattle has typically double dipped in deep talent pools in most drafts. But has opted for day 2/3 selections. Allowing talent to percolate down the list and use their top picks for addressing other needs.
I'd predict that Seattle looks at Washington's Byron Murphy as Earl's successor (regardless if they resign him or not). They are very similar type players. Which to me is crucial. Seattle has specific skill needs for our FS and most traditional safeties don't possess those traits. Murphy blends speed/instinct and ability to hit in a similar fashion that Thomas did coming out of UT. Murphy is likely to go in the teens to 20s. Right about where we're going to be picking.
Northwest Seahawk":tiv8uf5f said:Attyla the Hawk":tiv8uf5f said:It's worth revisiting the last time Pete rebuilt this defense in 2010.
That year he was lucky enough to start with his keystone position on defense: Earl Thomas
I would expect him to do the same now. Obviously I'd like to see them just resign Earl. He's worth the price whatever he gets. And there isn't an edge player who is as good at rushing the passer, as Earl is as good at being a game altering safety.
Failing that -- I think we're going to start at FS. Seattle has typically double dipped in deep talent pools in most drafts. But has opted for day 2/3 selections. Allowing talent to percolate down the list and use their top picks for addressing other needs.
I'd predict that Seattle looks at Washington's Byron Murphy as Earl's successor (regardless if they resign him or not). They are very similar type players. Which to me is crucial. Seattle has specific skill needs for our FS and most traditional safeties don't possess those traits. Murphy blends speed/instinct and ability to hit in a similar fashion that Thomas did coming out of UT. Murphy is likely to go in the teens to 20s. Right about where we're going to be picking.
There not taking a FS with there first pick.
Sgt. Largent":2g2z0j80 said:Northwest Seahawk":2g2z0j80 said:Attyla the Hawk":2g2z0j80 said:It's worth revisiting the last time Pete rebuilt this defense in 2010.
That year he was lucky enough to start with his keystone position on defense: Earl Thomas
I would expect him to do the same now. Obviously I'd like to see them just resign Earl. He's worth the price whatever he gets. And there isn't an edge player who is as good at rushing the passer, as Earl is as good at being a game altering safety.
Failing that -- I think we're going to start at FS. Seattle has typically double dipped in deep talent pools in most drafts. But has opted for day 2/3 selections. Allowing talent to percolate down the list and use their top picks for addressing other needs.
I'd predict that Seattle looks at Washington's Byron Murphy as Earl's successor (regardless if they resign him or not). They are very similar type players. Which to me is crucial. Seattle has specific skill needs for our FS and most traditional safeties don't possess those traits. Murphy blends speed/instinct and ability to hit in a similar fashion that Thomas did coming out of UT. Murphy is likely to go in the teens to 20s. Right about where we're going to be picking.
There not taking a FS with there first pick.
I think we were absolutely taking Derwin James with our first pick last year, but we missed out by one pick.
So Pete and John will absolutely take a game changing safety, FS or SS if that safety is special enough to draft high like Earl was.
Northwest Seahawk":1brao8md said:Sgt. Largent":1brao8md said:Northwest Seahawk":1brao8md said:Attyla the Hawk":1brao8md said:It's worth revisiting the last time Pete rebuilt this defense in 2010.
That year he was lucky enough to start with his keystone position on defense: Earl Thomas
I would expect him to do the same now. Obviously I'd like to see them just resign Earl. He's worth the price whatever he gets. And there isn't an edge player who is as good at rushing the passer, as Earl is as good at being a game altering safety.
Failing that -- I think we're going to start at FS. Seattle has typically double dipped in deep talent pools in most drafts. But has opted for day 2/3 selections. Allowing talent to percolate down the list and use their top picks for addressing other needs.
I'd predict that Seattle looks at Washington's Byron Murphy as Earl's successor (regardless if they resign him or not). They are very similar type players. Which to me is crucial. Seattle has specific skill needs for our FS and most traditional safeties don't possess those traits. Murphy blends speed/instinct and ability to hit in a similar fashion that Thomas did coming out of UT. Murphy is likely to go in the teens to 20s. Right about where we're going to be picking.
There not taking a FS with there first pick.
I think we were absolutely taking Derwin James with our first pick last year, but we missed out by one pick.
So Pete and John will absolutely take a game changing safety, FS or SS if that safety is special enough to draft high like Earl was.
Fine your on record there taking a Safety i disagree.