So you try to give a lesson on correlation vs causation and then use the 2 PPG as proof passing more was a bad idea? So its not the multiple injuries along the whole offensive line, losing Dissly who looked like your #2 option early in the year, having your best receiver retire and then losing 3 running backs late in the year as well as playing a much tougher schedule? real strong argument Scott. Passing more I'm sure was the reason we were down 2 PPG, holy shit dude you can't be serious. And also since you screwed this up I didn't say passing more I said they passed more early on in downs which I think helped. Healthy line, Dissly back, healthy running backs and factoring in the competition yeah I feel pretty confident it was the smart thing to do.
Not paying Wilson would have been catastrophic for the Seahawks.
Quit with the childish "I don't have an opinion of my own" I just gave you a strong opinion and supported it with multiple reasons why I believe what I believe.
Do you want to have an adult conversation or not? If you're just wanting to be a dick then quit asking me questions. If you want to discuss it then fine I'll do that too. But this back and forth bullshit is stupid and gums up the board.