Seahawks Avg Points Offense/Defense Predictions for 2013

Shock2k

New member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
1,183
Reaction score
0
Location
Superbowl Glory
I'm interested to know how good folks think the Seahawks will be this year, but from a more "scientific" perspective. I figure we can do this by estimating the average points offense/defense they will have by the end of the season.

My prediction (Defense is points against, offense is points for the team... obviously)

Offense: 28 Avg Points Scored
(Highest in the past 10 years was the Saints in 2011, which averaged 34.7 points a game)
(The Seahawks were #10 in 2012 averaging 25.8 per game. Which is great considering our rookie QB and the "training wheels" first half of the season.)

Defense: 15 Avg Points Against
(Lowest in the past 10 years was the Ravens in 2006, who averaged 12.7 points against)
(The Seahawks were #1 in 2012, averaging 16.1 points against)

Anyone think the Hawks will actually be better than the Saints or the Ravens?

2013 Defensive Thoughts:
I think most of us would agree our pass rush was bad against decent offensive lines last year. Opponent O-Line Game plan: block Chris Clemons. This was never more pronounced then when we played Atlanta and Washington. Sure as teams got tired we did well, but we were not one of the top teams in 1rst and 2nd quarter defense:

Hawks Points Against per Quarter (2012):
1rst Quarter: 4.2 (11th) (SF was 12th)
2nd Quarter: 5.2 (6th) (SF was 2nd)
3rd Quarter: 2.7 (2nd) (SF was 4th)
4th Quarter: 3.9 (2nd) (SF was 11th)

The point being we were a much better second half defensive team. Will the additions of Avril and Bennet, a new defensive scheme (coordinator) going to make a significant difference? Well with the secondary we have (adding Winfield), plus seasoning of Wagner and KJ, do we have the higher potential for "coverage sacks" and QB Pressures? I would argue yes.

And with just a little more pressure on opposing QB's we should be, scary to think, a much better defense. Further it would be nice to increase those first half defensive stats. Which I also think is a possibility.

2013 Offensive Thoughts(No pun intended):
I'm going to take a real liberty here and say the Seahawks Strength of Schedule will be the same as last year (technically it is, we had the 11th stongest schedule in 2012, and by what I read, we are 11th again this year). Though arguments can be made for (and have been made) for where/who/when we are playing on the road.

Harvin is an absolute beast. By no means should we expect that he will be playing for the whole season, but I will be interested to see how is health will be affected by the Seahawks excellent conditioning program. Even if Harvin can help us half the season, this could pay dividends in points scored in the season overall.

Beyond this, the most important factor is depth at key positions, especially adding Michael as a backup to Lynch. This was a key pickup as it mitigates a disaster at running back. By no means am I saying Michael is at the same level of talent as Lynch, but with the progress at QB we could maintain a high level of play even with the loss of lynch.

As far as rookies and free agents at TE, WR, O-Line, I have no idea. Personally I would like to see how all that plays out through the pre-season.

But our offense should show significant improvements over the 2012 season.

Historic Information:
http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/points-per-game
http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/op ... s-per-game
 

jlwaters1

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
2,992
Reaction score
93
31- PPG -offense
14-PPG- Defense.

Part of me things there will be opportunities this year to get out to a big lead early, making teams 1 dimensional. This would all Seattle to hold the ball for long periods of time chewing clock. Also as teams are further behind they take more risks, which could result in more turnovers for the defense.
 

Hawks46

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,498
Reaction score
0
I'd agree with the OP. 28 pts for and 15 against is a good ball park.

With the addition of Winfied, we'll be much stronger at the nickle than we were last year, meaning less 3rd down conversions (one of our achilles heels last year). If Chancellor can come back healthy and revert his coverage to 2011 instead of 2012, we'll also be better in the middle of the field on 3rd down.

That right there should keep the points scored as low or lower than last year, regardless of pass rush. Pash rush only helps this defense in completion % and turnovers.

Is a 13 point a game differential an NFL record or would the Pats still hold that for that (I think) 2006 season ?
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,665
Reaction score
1,728
Location
Orlando, FL...for good.
Harvin and Winfield, Russell Wilson with some experience under his belt, and no conservative run-all-the-time playcalling?

34 PPG on offense, 11.* (as in, under 12) PPG on defense.

We're going to be the premier elite team.
 
OP
OP
Shock2k

Shock2k

New member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
1,183
Reaction score
0
Location
Superbowl Glory
Hawks46":1xy34c13 said:
Is a 13 point a game differential an NFL record or would the Pats still hold that for that (I think) 2006 season ?

The 2007 New England Patriots scored 589 points in 16 regular season games for an average of 36.8 points per game with a point differential of +315 (19.68 / game), both NFL records.

RolandDeschain":1xy34c13 said:
Harvin and Winfield, Russell Wilson with some experience under his belt, and no conservative run-all-the-time playcalling?

34 PPG on offense, 11.* (as in, under 12) PPG on defense.

We're going to be the premier elite team.

I think with those stats, that would make this team the greatest in NFL history (if they ended with a Superbowl win).
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,631
Reaction score
2,887
I'm going with...

30 pts on Offense

15 pts on Defense
 

CrimsonWazzu

New member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
Wouldn't be surprised to see a much higher tempo style from the team this year. That'll result in allowing more ppg, plus the schedule is a little tougher.

29ppg offense
18ppg defense
 

Latest posts

Top