RGIII vs RW

Seahawkx

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
354
Reaction score
0
Day and Night difference!! RGIII is just so so inaccurate and a horrible decision maker. Poor Redskins!
 

joeseahawks

New member
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
2,248
Reaction score
0
Location
NC
If the Redskins had to draft again between RGIII, Tannerhill and Wilson, they will still pick RGIII, because Russell Wilson is still too short and RGIII is flashier and fits better with that Franchise.
A poorly run organization is a poorly run organization.
 
OP
OP
S

Seahawkx

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
354
Reaction score
0
joeseahawks":ot7e4ddq said:
If the Redskins had to draft again between RGIII, Tannerhill and Wilson, they will still pick RGIII, because Russell Wilson is still too short and RGIII is flashier and fits better with that Franchise.
A poorly run organization is a poorly run organization.

And RGIII gets awesome garbage time stats.. :lol:
 

OrFan

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
3,424
Reaction score
0
One is an athlete, and one is a great qb.
 

MizzouHawkGal

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
13,478
Reaction score
850
Location
Kansas City, MO
Man I hate that the Rams are going to be serious players next year and beyond all because of this stupid trade.
 

Sac

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
13,192
Reaction score
4
Location
With a White Girl
KCHawkGirl":d9oi5pjg said:
Man I hate that the Rams are going to be serious players next year and beyond all because of this stupid trade.

We can always hope they continue to have bad coaching!
 

OrFan

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
3,424
Reaction score
0
SacHawk2.0":2ssq1pyg said:
KCHawkGirl":2ssq1pyg said:
Man I hate that the Rams are going to be serious players next year and beyond all because of this stupid trade.

We can always hope they continue to have bad coaching!

So, you are hoping they continue to have a Fish tank?
 

Mitch

New member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I can slide better than RGIII! The guy's going to hurt himself.
 

Jac

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
1,428
Reaction score
960
joeseahawks":1sg9l4sv said:
If the Redskins had to draft again between RGIII, Tannerhill and Wilson, they will still pick RGIII, because Russell Wilson is still too short and RGIII is flashier and fits better with that Franchise.
A poorly run organization is a poorly run organization.

I doubt they would. Not only is Wilson a much better quarterback, he comes with much less drama. I live in DC, so I'm aware that every RG3 press conference is an adventure. Operation Patience and all that nonsense. He took the league by storm last year with the RO, but it's not clear that he can be anything but an average pocket passer (which he's not currently). So the Redskins get the lesser QB for the equivalent of three first rounders and one second-rounder.
 

Legion12Boom

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2013
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, WA
There is no comparison, RW3 has out played RG3 all season. RG3 has regressed just like Crapernick has this year. There not the same QB's as they were last year. RW3 is the man, Go Hawks!!
 

253hawk

Active member
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
3,322
Reaction score
15
Location
PNW
Griffin has already doubled his INT total from last year.
 

MizzouHawkGal

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
13,478
Reaction score
850
Location
Kansas City, MO
joeseahawks":2kionbzc said:
If the Redskins had to draft again between RGIII, Tannerhill and Wilson, they will still pick RGIII, because Russell Wilson is still too short and RGIII is flashier and fits better with that Franchise.
A poorly run organization is a poorly run organization.
The Redskins were just one of many teams planning to draft him if we didn't. Philadelphia and Indianapolis being a couple others.
 
Top