kearly
New member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 15,974
- Reaction score
- 0
mikeak":i7f3bb5d said:I tried to get through all 6 pages but might have missed someone making the point.
People are discussing the value based on 4 years - $27 million and to me that is not how you look at it.
He is playing next year for $1.5 million. He would not play for that. He would have sat out. So I move the $1.5 million to the 27 million and now I have a $28.5 million contract for 5 years.
That is $5.7million per year.
Yes you can get into the whole - if it is backloaded that may not pay out etc as well. Point being - look at it as a five year deal counting next year.
I struggle to imagine Wright holding out. And even if he did, we have some very recent history on this matter involving a much more prominent player. The Hawks FO didn't lose sleep over Lynch, they wouldn't fret Wright. Also, if you want a big extension from Pete, I think the very worst thing you could do is hold out. When Clemons did it, it only bought him one extra year. When Baldwin sort of did it, it bought him two extra years. When Lynch did it, he got next to nothing. The players who 'protected the team' by avoiding holdouts consistently got much bigger deals.
Generally speaking, it annoys me when people disregard the final cheap year of a contract. It is an asset that belongs to the Hawks. It does not disappear when they sign players to extensions. Yes, the average cap hit lessens, but that is only because Seattle worked a deal that split that final rookie year advantage over five seasons instead of one. With the new rolling cap this isn't really the advantage it used to be, and if Wright is here for the full contract it will be exactly the same as if we signed him to a 4/27 deal after his rookie year expires.
(Edit: KJ was a 2015 FA)