tom sawyer
New member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 1,737
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah. Our offense forsure!!
But I also don't look beyond our headlights... 1-0
Win in AZ!!
But I also don't look beyond our headlights... 1-0
Win in AZ!!
Hasselbeck":1lb7dfie said:HawkFan72":1lb7dfie said:Cowboys O-line and D-line scare me. I don't want to play them again. Our guys were manhandled on both sides of the ball for the whole game.
Eh.. really do not fear the Cowboys at all. The Seahawks could not have played any worse that day.. Wagner hurt himself, Kam was playing at like 50% .. Maxwell left early. Simon was out. And collectively the vibe from the whole team was just off.. whether or not that was Harvin related or not.. who knows.
But all of this happened and it took an unreal catch on 3rd and Wenatchee to eventually get the go ahead TD.
I just think this team is light years better than they were in Week 6.
I also think the Cowboys will miss the playoffs after a loss to Indy and two Eagles wins.
I'll change it to "49". So I'm shitty with roman numerals. Sheesh... :roll:onanygivensunday":29m5pu40 said:DING... DING... DING... we have a winner.CurryStopstheRuns":29m5pu40 said:Father Time.
SB XIX was played on January 20th, 1985.
grizbob":2qgvsbkv said:Seattle Seahawks :180670:
hawksfansinceday1":1yn4x7kn said:So I've been thinking about this since yesterday and figured it might be fun to check the pulse of dot Net when it comes to my pondering.
Yes, I know I'm getting a bit ahead of myself, and yes I know 1-0 every week. But that's stuff the team needs to be focused on. IMO, we as fans get to look ahead and speculate and that's what this is......speculation.
For me, it's Dullass. I think Green Bay is soft and our Hawks eat soft teams for breakfast, lunch and dinner. I think Arizona has too much to overcome at the QB position. I believe the Eagles don't get in and I believe the NFC South winner is crap no matter who it is. That leaves the Lions and the Cowpatties. I do think Detroit is a very good team and I almost picked them. Their D is for real and Stafford seems to have mostly figured out that interceptions hurt a team. However, they don't run the ball well and that usually bites teams in the rear end in January.
Dullass has a number of factors going for them that will make a game against them a tough one IMO. Their weakest area, that defense, is matched against our team's weakest area, our offense. On offense, they pass block very well and run the ball very well. They are also 7-0 on the road this year so if the game is indeed in Seattle they have that going or them as well. Maybe most importantly, they already know they can win at the C-Link.
To beat them, I think the Hawks need to dominate time of possession and find ways to make Romo nervous. Once he's nervous, he screws up and in order to make that happen the Hawks need to really slow down their run gam and make them work a lot from third and long. Pretty basic stuff, but its the formula Seattle has used to win a lot the last couple of years.
therealjohncarlson":16uwfwox said:pmedic920":16uwfwox said:IMHO, if you vote for anybody besides the Cards, you're putting the cart before the horse.
We still have two very important games to play.
As far as I'm concerned both are "must win"
If we end up seeded #1, I think we re-Pete.
I don't like our chances one bit, as a wild card.
The question wasn't the most immediate road block, it was the biggest roadblock. I think an argument could definitely be made that a team not starting their 20th string QB is a larger road block than the cardinals overall
hawksfansinceday1":3urw83fq said:I'll change it to "49". So I'm shitty with roman numerals. Sheesh... :roll:onanygivensunday":3urw83fq said:DING... DING... DING... we have a winner.CurryStopstheRuns":3urw83fq said:Father Time.
SB XIX was played on January 20th, 1985.
therealjohncarlson":1amk4jd1 said:pmedic920":1amk4jd1 said:IMHO, if you vote for anybody besides the Cards, you're putting the cart before the horse.
We still have two very important games to play.
As far as I'm concerned both are "must win"
If we end up seeded #1, I think we re-Pete.
I don't like our chances one bit, as a wild card.
The question wasn't the most immediate road block, it was the biggest roadblock. I think an argument could definitely be made that a team not starting their 20th string QB is a larger road block than the cardinals overall
MizzouHawkGal said:........I would have said Dallas but Murray breaking his hand changes everything for Dallas............../quote]
That could hurt them badly for sure. I believe that if I've read the playoff scenarios correctly, that they could be left out if they lose one more and Philly wins out and the 2nd place NFCN team finished 11-5.
Correct or if Philadelphia wins out and Dallas wins out somehow there will be an 11-5 team outside the playoffs. I want it to be Dallas because Jerry Jones will force what needs to be done already. They need to reseed for the playoffs and allow 7 teams per conference in with the 1st seed getting the bye. Last year it was Pittsburgh this year it will be Philadelphia or Dallas and possibly an AFC team that goes 10-6. That latter scenerio is less likely but very possible.hawksfansinceday1":lsanorrn said:MizzouHawkGal":lsanorrn said:........I would have said Dallas but Murray breaking his hand changes everything for Dallas............../quote]
That could hurt them badly for sure. I believe that if I've read the playoff scenarios correctly, that they could be left out if they lose one more and Philly wins out and the 2nd place NFCN team finished 11-5.