mikeak
Well-known member
Being wrong and corrected happens all the time but to keep stating false information and just making it up is in nobody's interest
bigskydoc":f4yxpcsy said:Get a new tax guy.
bigskydoc":2v4toect said:Get a new tax guy.
SoulfishHawk":1hzcdoxg said:I heard it might rain tomorrow. Thanks a lot Russ.
SoulfishHawk":2omp59pf said:Death, Taxes and criticism for the best QB in team history, no matter WHAT the subject may be :lol:
hawknation2017":mjwtof0l said:Tinymac2":mjwtof0l said:So pissed. You bring in a 23 year LT and take care of the issue for a decade. DB gives us 2-3 years. What a long term waste.
Bahahahahahahahahahaha.
Do you have a franchise LT fabricating machine that I don't know about?
One more thing: Bahahahahahaha. Ha!
Seymour":mjwtof0l said:Pocic playing right next to Brown is going to benefit from this trade as well. Having to play next to Rees who is still getting owned all to regularly was not the best position to put him in. :2thumbs:
True, good point. I think this will make everyone better. 8)
Pandion Haliaetus":2ftoivgz said:My thoughts on the value of what the Seahawks gave up:
If you win, you didn't lose.
1-2 weeks ago, I feel much better adding Brown after the Seahawks added Freeney.
10 year vet + top 10 LT consistently throughout his career + vocal leader = great mentor.
Freeney is also a great mentor.
But to me it all comes around ten fold.
Freeney is going to help develop the pass-rush guys by sharing his skill set and his experience. Our young DEs are going to be better in the long-run.
Brown is not only going to help solidify the line, think of how much the young Olinemen can learn and develop behind his lead. It's a legit positive domino effect of influence.
A month from now, the Oline and the pass-rush is going to be smarter, wiser, and more advanced if the younger guys on both sides put in the time to learn and pick brains and emulate.
However, the biggest kicker imo guys are going to improve through practice too. Iron sharpens iron.
Freeney's influence isn't going to effect just the pass-rush group but he's going to help the Olinemen that spar against him improve.
Likewise with Brown against the DEs he'll face.
All of a sudden because of two moves, depth and performance looks to gradually improve, develop, and galvanize in two key areas.
And if it does look out... no one in the league wants Seattle to have a functional O-Line. No one wants to face that Defense, if the Seahawks can run the ball consistently and effectively with success.
Anthony!":nccz3zrg said:Scorpion05":nccz3zrg said:I was referring to the IRS and their specific bonus guidelines, so it is Federal
Bro, I am in no way here to say Russell Wilson is somehow suffering. You can put a bunch of financial advisors/accountants in a room and they'll have disagreements. The only thing I disagree with you on is that "everyone" would do this. I disagree, the history of the league has shown the minority of top players do this. There are pros and cons
Russell has an elite team around him. Whatever money he loses this year he'll make back through investments, the growth of his TraceMe app, etc. Overall, I just find this whole back and forth silly. We should be happy about this trade and that's the bottom line. And we should be able to discuss basic contract stuff instead of simply trying to win an argument. I don't pretend to be a financial expert, or a contract expert. But from even the basic information I've read there are pros and cons to what he did. Which is why not everyone does it. That's it
Side Note: And quite frankly, his contract was already friendly in the first place. Even when he got his contract, it wasn't Derek Carr/Matthew Stafford type ground breaking. So he has already shown he's willing to think of the team first. I hope we can all at least agree with that
For me, the whole thing is laughable and is yet another reason I stopped posting here for a while. I remember a few years ago Brady did this, back when Wilson was doing his first contract after being a rookie. Everyone said look Brady does whats best for the team etc, etc. Yet the reality was he was still getting his, only paying taxes differently. Now that it is Wilson we have a small group making lite of it like it is no big deal. I bet if it was Sherman they would be like see he is such a team guy etc. The reality is it is a big deal, he did not have to do it, and yes there is going to be some extra tax issues despite what some here are trying to say, the one rule stated here even says "can take a bigger tax bite out of your bonus payments." I just got off the phone with my Tax guy who is also a Hawks fan, and he said there are other taxes and penalties that are involved, In the end this will cost Wilson about 18% more in taxes in the end. People seem to think it is as simple as a tax bracket but it's not, different types of income have different rules, and different guidelines.
All that said, in the end, it really does not matter the reality is he did it, and it is something that a lot of people don't do, so instead of making lite of it or downplaying it, we should be embracing that he did this. As I said it if were almost anyone's on this team you guys would be all over it, when it was Brady you were all over it, Now that its Wilson you make lite of it, it's pathetic and shows whats wrong with this forum. You have a small group of people and their many aliases who attack, minimize and strike down anything positive about Wilson. How much better it would it be if we could all celebrate good things by any player on this team without having a small group ruin it. The question now is, did I actually get through to anyone or waste my time. I think I know I just hope I am wrong
SoulfishHawk":3dttjdis said:Death, Taxes and criticism for the best QB in team history, no matter WHAT the subject may be :lol: