SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
Hawks D can keep them in any game. Not gonna' assume a loss at all. It would take their best game of the year, but they are very capable. Winning big games is pretty common for these Hawks.
SoulfishHawk":3ujarguh said:Hawks D can keep them in any game. Not gonna' assume a loss at all. It would take their best game of the year, but they are very capable. Winning big games is pretty common for these Hawks.
We need to pressure the ginger into throwing a pick or two...seahawkfreak":1ast8a21 said:SoulfishHawk":1ast8a21 said:Hawks D can keep them in any game. Not gonna' assume a loss at all. It would take their best game of the year, but they are very capable. Winning big games is pretty common for these Hawks.
This is true, if we can get the offense insync a couple times, maybe a turnover or two we should be ok.
DeeHawks":2rfthn5v said:We need to pressure the ginger into throwing a pick or two...seahawkfreak":2rfthn5v said:SoulfishHawk":2rfthn5v said:Hawks D can keep them in any game. Not gonna' assume a loss at all. It would take their best game of the year, but they are very capable. Winning big games is pretty common for these Hawks.
This is true, if we can get the offense insync a couple times, maybe a turnover or two we should be ok.
Beasts injury must be pretty bad...when was the last time (if ever) he has missed 2 games in a row?
With Burley out who plays nickel?Hasselbeck":1dzwjrq1 said:I'm a lot more worried being down THREE corners for the game.
pacific101":3ryoy0d8 said:Yeah I saw that coming the other day, they said he was looking good and all but ready to play, but decided to give him another week before playing him and risking the possibility of further agitating the situation to the point it might keep him off the field for several weeks. It's going to be a tough game for us with or without him, and while I'm sure some won't agree with me, I think this new blood "Rawls" can get the job done for us in Lynch's absence.