JSeahawks
Well-known member
Oh, I agree it hurts. Its going to hurt our pass protection certainly. I just don't think it will be the difference between winning and losing.
Tech Worlds":1hibbmio said:JSeahawks":1hibbmio said:The season goes on. We keep winning. Next man up.
As long as the D keeps playing at the same level (and I think they're only going to get better) I don't see a loss on our schedule with or without big Russ.
And no, i'm not predicting an undefeated season, but I don't see any game where we shouldn't be favored to win.
That is our starting left tackle. Without him Russell is going to be hit more. I don't like that. This isn't just "next man up".
Will I":2gylnqf2 said:Tech Worlds":2gylnqf2 said:JSeahawks":2gylnqf2 said:The season goes on. We keep winning. Next man up.
As long as the D keeps playing at the same level (and I think they're only going to get better) I don't see a loss on our schedule with or without big Russ.
And no, i'm not predicting an undefeated season, but I don't see any game where we shouldn't be favored to win.
That is our starting left tackle. Without him Russell is going to be hit more. I don't like that. This isn't just "next man up".
Guess there's always next year... :sarcasm_off:
HawkWow":1ahrhll8 said:Gap Filler":1ahrhll8 said:You think we will need him against JJ Watt? You don't say?
Get used to seeing our 10 million dollar tight end playing tackle again
We will use anyone we have to protect RW, regardless of the players position or salary. You make it sound like the injury to Okung was a simple matter of poor planning. The whining makes you sound like a converted 9er fan.
I laughed. If he's truly "In"... :laugh:drdiags":26gv8lwu said:w00t":26gv8lwu said:well adam schefter just said on NFL LIVE that okung tore a ligament in his toe and is out vs the jags. We don't need okung vs the jags but we def need him down the road.
That sucks. I would think this is worse than a sprained ligament. Maybe he can just chop it off? Just joking.
You know... against JAX, maybe they'll rotate at least. McQ is used to rotating and seems like a good time to get some guys some experience. Probably be wise to try to get the game in hand first, though. Might see more lineman active this week to get any and all game experience.McGruff":8quzvxvx said:Doubt they go with Baley. McQ will get the starts.
JSeahawks":351xjh58 said:Oh, I agree it hurts. Its going to hurt our pass protection certainly. I just don't think it will be the difference between winning and losing.
DavidSeven":33jfg4fv said:There's a reason why Left Tackle is the second highest paid position in the NFL, and there's a reason why rebuilding franchises invariably take Left Tackles high in the draft. This would be no small loss. Left Tackle is a building-block position, second only to QB.
Can we survive it? Yes. But it will be a task. I imagine we will lean even heavier on the run game and the zone blocking scheme. We'll probably rely a ton on the TE to help on the left side, which means Miller will get even less targets. Getting Percy back suddenly becomes huge. His ability to make plays from the flat or LOS will add a necessary dynamic element to this sort of offense.
HawkFan72":349pkxaw said:DavidSeven":349pkxaw said:There's a reason why Left Tackle is the second highest paid position in the NFL, and there's a reason why rebuilding franchises invariably take Left Tackles high in the draft. This would be no small loss. Left Tackle is a building-block position, second only to QB.
Can we survive it? Yes. But it will be a task. I imagine we will lean even heavier on the run game and the zone blocking scheme. We'll probably rely a ton on the TE to help on the left side, which means Miller will get even less targets. Getting Percy back suddenly becomes huge. His ability to make plays from the flat or LOS will add a necessary dynamic element to this sort of offense.
Denver has lost their starting LT and starting C for the year. It will be interesting to see if they can weather the storm as well.