Aristotle22
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2012
- Messages
- 580
- Reaction score
- 0
It Could Take Away A Touchdown. Seems ridiculous To Me.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9903854/dean-blandino-nfl-mull-taunting-rule-tweakSturm":3ilsfjsl said:Source?
Head of officiating Dean Blandino said the NFL's competition committee likely will review the league's taunting rule this offseason.
kidhawk":52qwia4a said:I understand the desire by the NFL to stop taunting, but it shouldn't have an effect on the outcome of the play. The types of fouls that aren't giving a team an illegal advantage on a play shouldn't reverse the play. Taunting doesn't give a team an advantage, so why take away the play? Things like holding, pass interference and such do give an advantage, but taunting doesn't give an advantage in any way, shape or form. If anything, it has more possible ways to disadvantage a team as we saw Monday night when Tate nearly went out of bounds while he was taunting. Personally, I feel if they want to make for a harsher punishment, then fine them increasingly for each taunting foul they incur throughout their career. Eventually either a play stops taunting or goes broke
Good idea, that's the better route to go IMHO.kidhawk":1yyo3lkp said:I understand the desire by the NFL to stop taunting, but it shouldn't have an effect on the outcome of the play. The types of fouls that aren't giving a team an illegal advantage on a play shouldn't reverse the play. Taunting doesn't give a team an advantage, so why take away the play? Things like holding, pass interference and such do give an advantage, but taunting doesn't give an advantage in any way, shape or form. If anything, it has more possible ways to disadvantage a team as we saw Monday night when Tate nearly went out of bounds while he was taunting. Personally, I feel if they want to make for a harsher punishment, then fine them increasingly for each taunting foul they incur throughout their career. Eventually either a play stops taunting or goes broke
Aristotle22":1w22ryve said:It Could Take Away A Touchdown. Seems ridiculous To Me.
MontanaHawk05":3lkac74q said:Can we have the thread title changed as it's misleading?
Because they hate the Seahawks and us doing well gets under their skin.SeeHawkRun":8exe20vw said:Why is it that Golden Tate seems to (at least unofficially) be the catalyst for massive NFL change. If this rule change does occur (I think it's a dumb idea, for the record), that will make it twice that a play Tate was involved in prompted the NFL (seemingly) to force a change.
The reception against the Packers that brought back the official refs last season, and now a taunt on what ended up being the deciding score of the game.
Don't forget the "slick ball" rule that was created because crazy uncle Jerry cried to his buddy Rog after Romo fumbled the snap on the FG against the a Hawks in the playoffs here.SeeHawkRun":1wes8aft said:Why is it that Golden Tate seems to (at least unofficially) be the catalyst for massive NFL change. If this rule change does occur (I think it's a dumb idea, for the record), that will make it twice that a play Tate was involved in prompted the NFL (seemingly) to force a change.
The reception against the Packers that brought back the official refs last season, and now a taunt on what ended up being the deciding score of the game.