I was watching to see someone start this thread. I don't support the idea of reviewing PI calls or non calls at all. Its like Sherm said in a press conference recently, the NFL has made it almost impossible for all the players at his position to achieve historical greatness, and went on to say that a lot of the greats from yesteryear would not fare well at all in today's NFL due to all the rule changes. I'm sure the person who started this thread and a lot of those who supported the idea, did so because they thought it would have turned yesterdays loss to Seattle into a win for the Falcon's, not stopping to think about all the times their CBs interfered with the Seahawks receivers. I suspect had that been the case in this game in particular, that the Hawks would have blown the Falcon's out by considerably more than they did. Go back and watch the game film, when the Falcon's scored it was due to blown coverage by the Hawks, on more than a few occasions when the Hawks failed to convert on 3rd downs which surely would have resulted in more points by field goals or touchdowns, due to pass interference offenses that were not called on the Falcon defenders. The refs have to allow for some defense, or we would have to stop and review every single pass thrown. I think they have decided that unless its grossly obvious they are letting the players fight it out, which we all like until its our team that we feel lost as a result of a missed call by the refs. On this one issue I think the refs are trying to be fair and reasonable for the most part. Now about allowing d line players to take cheap shots on the QBs after they have released the ball, I wouldn't mind seeing that become reviewable, way to many QBs getting injured due to late hits, career ending in many instances.