SantaClaraHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 15,007
- Reaction score
- 3,092
Not that this wouldve Helped Shan who f around and found out by not even having this option on the practice squad.
Last edited:
I like it, just so injured players don't have to go back in like Purdy, but it wouldn't have helped the Whiners. They were already done.
Yes, I forgot about that but here's a blurb about it I found online:Didn't that used to be the rule? You get to designate a 3d QB who doesn't count against the 45 man game day active list?
https://www.hogshaven.com/2020/6/20/21296520/why-does-the-nfl-have-inactive-players-on-game-dayfrom 1991 to 2011, the NFL had a rule that allowed “emergency” QBs. At the time, the math was 53 players – 8 inactive (if one was an emergency QB who could only play if the other 2 QBs were injured) = 45 active. In 2011, they simply expanded the active game day roster to 46 players and got rid of the emergency QB rule.
Didn't that used to be the rule? You get to designate a 3d QB who doesn't count against the 45 man game day active list?
YES. It would give more players paid and a chance to succeed. Of course it helpsPart of the problem is the archaic rule of only being able to have 48 of 53 players active. Pete Carroll has pushed for many years for the ability to have all 53 men on the roster available on game days. That would go a long way towards teams being comfortable having another spot for a QB... Not to mention, it would allow coaches to rotate guys more, giving them less reps and potentially keeping more guys healthier.