Less Than 48 Hours...

[AROS]

...

 

[Axx]

i dont understand what you're asking

 

[Bigpumpkin]

If Percy plays...I say we have a 65% chance of winning. Not having him....we drop to a 51-49 chance of winning.

 

[hawker84]

same for me. regardless if harvin plays or not. i think we win a sqeeker

 

[minormillikin]

Answer : 47 hours

 

[AROS]

I don't get that mindset personally. We were 9-1 before Percy Harvin. Suddenly if he doesn't play our chances of beating the Saints at home plummets?

Fuzzy logic. Nothing personal.

 

[Joey13091]

I don't get that mindset personally. We were 9-1 before Percy Harvin. Suddenly if he doesn't play our chances of beating the Saints at home plummets?

Fuzzy logic. Nothing personal.

Exactly look what we've done without him out there.

He would definitely give us a boost though.

 

[AROS]

Totally. I get that having him in the lineup is a boost, no question. He's lightning in a bottle and the defense has to account for him at all times which frees up some of our other guys.

Still, we were 9-1 without him for a reason.

This team is bad ass with, or without Percy Harvin, period.

 

[Rocket]

The corners worry me more than the lack of Percy.
I still think we're gonna win, but clearly single digit.

Yes, we bad asses...

 

[JSeahawks]

There's not a team in the league that I fear when we're playing at home. That doesn't mean we'll win every single time, but it means going into the game i'll always be confident.

To be honest, I don't think its going to even be a real close game. I think we cover the spread rather easily. Maybe double it.

 

[MidwestHawker]

If Percy plays...I say we have a 65% chance of winning. Not having him....we drop to a 51-49 chance of winning.

We're favored by 5. Teams favored by between 4 and 6.5 points win at approximately a 67% clip historically. Not only did the line not move in New Orleans' favor upon Harvin's listing as doubtful, but it has actually gone from -4.5 to -5 during that time. This is not to suggest that the sharps think we're better off without Harvin, but that the line was going to correct itself to -5 anyway and that the Harvin news didn't even manage to stop it from doing that.

No way our odds of winning drop by 14% without Harvin.

 

[400WattHPSHawk]

There's not a team in the league that I fear when we're playing at home. That doesn't mean we'll win every single time, but it means going into the game i'll always be confident.

To be honest, I don't think its going to even be a real close game. I think we cover the spread rather easily. Maybe double it.

You just may be f**king crazy enough for this to work.

 

[therealjohncarlson]

"Then before" what? Count me in the camp of not understanding the question. If you meant to say before we knew Percy was probably out, maybe you could make that clearer?

 

[ivotuk]

If Percy plays...I say we have a 65% chance of winning. Not having him....we drop to a 51-49 chance of winning.

If Percy plays we have a 100% chance of beating them. If Percy doesn't play we have a 99.999% chance of beating them. :snack:

 

[MizzouHawkGal]

No change for me we win likely by 4-6 instead of 10-11 that I predicted earlier.

 

[Bigpumpkin]

If Percy plays...I say we have a 65% chance of winning. Not having him....we drop to a 51-49 chance of winning.

If Percy plays we have a 100% chance of beating them. If Percy doesn't play we have a 99.999% chance of beating them. :snack:

Optimism personified!

 

[Rocket]

Percy doesn't matter... he made one catch.
It's the corners I tell ya, the corners.

 

[bellingerga]

I feel more confident. Because Russell Wilson.

 

[LawlessHawk]

Hawks will win. In fact I think its going to be an absolute beating...

Russell Wilson may never loose a game at the clink in his career...

 

[MizzouHawkGal]

Hawks will win. In fact I think its going to be an absolute beating...

Russell Wilson may never loose a game at the clink in his career...

I like the way you think and given how good Brady is at home you may not be as off as some may think.