Kurt Warner on Drew Lock

nwHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
4,800
Reaction score
2,203
I watched that one too. Kurt certainly pointed out holes in Russell’s game. But many didn’t like it when he did. Calling Kurt a jealous Ex-Cardinal. I though he was fair and realistic.
 

ElvisInBlue

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 5, 2022
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
799
Sure, but not this year unless it’s a late round flyer.
 

sc85sis

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
8,613
Reaction score
1,494
Location
Houston Suburbs
I watched that one too. Kurt certainly pointed out holes in Russell’s game. But many didn’t like it when he did. Calling Kurt a jealous Ex-Cardinal. I though he was fair and realistic.
Just watched it. There were multiple times in the film Kurt reviewed in which Russ could have taken shorter completions to move the chains and didn't. Most of them ended up with incompletions or sacks as a result.
 

Chukarhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,638
Reaction score
3,585
never been a big fan of Kurt Warner. Biased and envious of other players isn't a take I put much stock in.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,671
Reaction score
10,436
Location
Cockeysville, Md
never been a big fan of Kurt Warner. Biased and envious of other players isn't a take I put much stock in.
Analyzing tape and the nuance of a play is an objective study. Kurt might have favorites in the league but the biggest Lock supporter in the world wouldn't be able to defend the faults that Kurt pointed out in his review. And those faults are pretty much in line with general assessments of Lock to date. Big arm, sometimes impatient, relies on his arm more than his head, questionable technique at times. All things that are coachable. To what degree, remains to be seen.

He had a similarly critical review of a qb who played here recently that was also dismissed by some over the perception that Kurt didn't like him. Film is film. Football is football. Either the play is executed by the player as intended or its not. Feelings have no bearing on that.

One thing I'm seeing in Lock... his play reminds me of Jay Cutler ... a lot. Hopefully he turns out to be a better player. Cutler had all the talent in the world but never seemed to put in the time to match his xs and os ability with his arm talent. He also suffered from some maturity issues that Lock doesn't seem to have...
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
14,954
Reaction score
10,491
Location
SoCal Desert
Analyzing tape and the nuance of a play is an objective study. Kurt might have favorites in the league but the biggest Lock supporter in the world wouldn't be able to defend the faults that Kurt pointed out in his review. And those faults are pretty much in line with general assessments of Lock to date. Big arm, sometimes impatient, relies on his arm more than his head, questionable technique at times. All things that are coachable. To what degree, remains to be seen.

He had a similarly critical review of a qb who played here recently that was also dismissed by some over the perception that Kurt didn't like him. Film is film. Football is football. Either the play is executed by the player as intended or its not. Feelings have no bearing on that.

One thing I'm seeing in Lock... his play reminds me of Jay Cutler ... a lot. Hopefully he turns out to be a better player. Cutler had all the talent in the world but never seemed to put in the time to match his xs and os ability with his arm talent. He also suffered from some maturity issues that Lock doesn't seem to have...
Bill Walsh said what he liked in Montana was Joe's footwork and poise under fire, with that, couple of things stood out in Kurt's assessment:
  1. Footwork, or lack of it. His throws could have been better if he could improve his footwork. His lack of accuracies often resulted from poor footwork.
  2. Poise, or lack of it. He often panic which led to lousy footwork or started to rely too much on his big arm.
  3. With his big arm, his long balls often went quite flat or low, making catch difficult and INT easier. Man, we gonna miss Russ's moonballs.
One would think 1 and 3 could be coached on? 2 is something either you got it or you don't?
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,671
Reaction score
10,436
Location
Cockeysville, Md
I think 2 is coachable as well. It's a matter of knowing what's coming, presnap pressure wise, communicating well with your line, and knowing where your hot read is if you need it.

That's all coaching and prepping a young player for what the defense is going to do. Because invariably what they're going to throw at a young guy is different than what weekly tape might show. It's prep and rep, over and over in as many hypothetical situations as possible until there are as few surprises as possible.

A running game that helps make those reads easier and keep the defense guessing will be Locks best friend in limiting mistakes.
 

RedAlice

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 24, 2012
Messages
5,913
Reaction score
1,734
Location
Seattle Area
I watched that one too. Kurt certainly pointed out holes in Russell’s game. But many didn’t like it when he did. Calling Kurt a jealous Ex-Cardinal. I though he was fair and realistic.

Why would you ever think Kurt is fair and realistic?

Have you not watched him talk about the Rams?
 

audioeffects

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2022
Messages
42
Reaction score
33
Location
Illinois
Warner on Lock!! Think we need to draft a QB?


Thanks for posting this. It may come down to better coaching and getting Lock into a good place to run this offense the way it is designed to be executed. It appears that he has to get good at managing the game so his big arm can be taken more seriously.
 
Top