sc85sis":1llegcl6 said:Smith isn't the QB you want if you have to start slinging it down the field to come from behind.
Indeed, and this game pretty much confirms the "book" on KC. If you can by hook or by crook get two scores up on them, you win.
sc85sis":1llegcl6 said:Smith isn't the QB you want if you have to start slinging it down the field to come from behind.
Exittium":1bg090b9 said:This was an amusing game.. Doesn't it place the Hawks.. In unfamiliar territory like. Being the #1 overall in the NFL?
DrDix":1ac4up4c said:I think too many of you get caught up in the Broncos offense. It happens every year. Comments like "KC doesn't have the offense to keep up with Peyton." That's an ignorant comment. It's like KC's #1 defense doesn't exist and Denver is going to score at will. Wrong. #1 defense > #1 offense every single week. Offense is way too overhyped. Unfortunately that is today's NFL. Don't expect Denver to get a lot of points. Manning is obviously hurt marginally, and the defense WILL get pressure on him. That is the key to stopping Peyton. Don't be surprised if the Chiefs win.
Axx":1ac4up4c said:volsunghawk":1ac4up4c said:Don't see how KC has the offense to keep up with Denver.
Don't see how Denver has the defense to stop anyone.
Nope. Seattle's QB is too short.Exittium":1lravkkp said:This was an amusing game.. Doesn't it place the Hawks.. In unfamiliar territory like. Being the #1 overall in the NFL?