I keep reading...

GemCity

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
5,333
Reaction score
6,955
It sucks losing any part of a Super Bowl team but, it happens year after year.

I would’ve loved to have kept Walker but at what future cost? Lose a guy like Murphy? Maybe can’t pay a guy like Spoon?

If Charbonnet were healthy, I doubt we’d be having this conversation.

Something tells me that JS and MM believe we can run it with the guys we have or they’re going to snatch a guy in the draft…any/all that will likely be the #2 punch with Charb taking over #1. That model works well.

Statistically, K9 will likely have a better season in KC but, who knows? He worked well within Seattles RB room…definitely benefitted from not having to shoulder the entire load himself.

No doubt the loss will be felt but..I think there’s much bigger roadblocks ahead such as having a new OC.
 
Last edited:

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,210
Reaction score
2,251
I like UW's Jonah Coleman with our pick at 64. His stats for 3yrs are consistently good, rushing and receiving, good blocker and over his 4yr career he never fumbled, and was out one week for injuries. Low to the ground and 228 lbs.
Coleman got lots of his yards vs bad teams. He disappeared against any team with a pulse. And 4ypc in college, isn’t great. Should be over 5ypc.

Personally I like Jadarian Price, (although he might go to high for JS taste), Allen from Penn St or Washington better. We need someone who can handle being the starter until Charbs returns.
 

FrodosFinger

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
3,599
Reaction score
3,913
It’s crazy how many healthy running backs you can have on roster when training camp and preseason starts, then by week 1 you’re down to 2 or 3 healthy running backs and dwindling. I don’t think I’ve ever seen Walker have a completely healthy season aside from the times he’s splitting carries.
 

Hawk-Lock

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
5,677
Reaction score
911
If there is one position you don’t need to invest in it’s the RB spot. For the most part it is a plug and play position.

Just look at the last handful of SB champions. Here are a list of the starting RB’s from the championship team:

2025: K9
2024: Saquon Barkley
2023: Pacheco
2022: Pacheco and CEH
2021: Darrell Henderson, Akers and Sony Michel
2020: Damien Williams
2019: James White and Sony Michel
2018: Ajayi and Blount
2017: Blount and James White
2016: CJ Anderson

Outside of Saquon Barkley, most these guys are average RB’s at best.
 

Year of The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
351
Location
Idaho
The real issue is blocking. If you can block well any competent RB is going to be fine.
This. Our offensive line improved bigly last season. All same starters are coming back. Continuity is huge on the OL. While K9 did ball out I do feel some credit should be given to the O-line. I feel this bodes well for not having a top tier RB until Charbs gets back to 100%. Who knows they might draft the next it guy and then nothing to worry about.
 

LeveeBreak

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
2,863
Reaction score
3,667
Location
Oregon Wine Region
In the last 30 years (1996–2025), 54 running backs have been selected in the first round of the NFL Draft.

Keep lying to yourself.
That’s less than 2 per year though out of what, 10-12 position groups? I think it says 1st round talent must be exceptional and you can find value in 2-7. Walker is very good, he’s not exceptional.

We’ve gone from the lowest spend on O to ~top 10. That gonna go up with JSN and Darnold. RB is where they are taking an informed risk, and IMO, it makes sense.
 

BigMeach

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,208
Reaction score
709
In the last 30 years (1996–2025), 54 running backs have been selected in the first round of the NFL Draft.

Keep lying to yourself.
My only problem with this stat is you have to go back 30 years for it to work. Football and especially the NFL is an ever changing product due to rule changes and ingenuity. If we go with this same theme but only go back the last decade, it's 9 RB's taken in 10 years within the first round.
 

LeveeBreak

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
2,863
Reaction score
3,667
Location
Oregon Wine Region
KJ’s been dogged unfairly about his pass catching abilities, but he’s not a premier all-around RB and that’s what separates the elite’s, their total production.

He wasn’t worth to us what he was paid. You don’t overspend when you can get multiple guys with potential to fill that role for 1/2 the cost.
 

Seahawker

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
3,245
This. Our offensive line improved bigly last season. All same starters are coming back. Continuity is huge on the OL. While K9 did ball out I do feel some credit should be given to the O-line. I feel this bodes well for not having a top tier RB until Charbs gets back to 100%. Who knows they might draft the next it guy and then nothing to worry about.
Yes and yes.
I really think Robbie Ouzts could hit his stride this season as a punishing blocker leading to many highlight clips.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
41,742
Reaction score
4,539
Location
Roy Wa.
Many here don't get it, football is cyclic, first it's the Running game, then the passing game then a dominant defense, then big fron, fast fronts, big corners, fast corners, now tweeners at safety, now with smallish lines on defense and smaller seconadrys we are goimg back to Running game. Look over the years, the ebb and flow of the NFL, we are back to RB's being important after a decade of them being almost taken out of the game with a few exceptions.
 
OP
OP
HagFaithful

HagFaithful

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
522
Reaction score
414
My only problem with this stat is you have to go back 30 years for it to work. Football and especially the NFL is an ever changing product due to rule changes and ingenuity. If we go with this same theme but only go back the last decade, it's 9 RB's taken in 10 years within the first round.
The guy said it's been like this for decades.

Hence, the 30 year historical.

Don't give me no run-of-the-mill bammer-ass RB on the cheap. Spend that damn money, trade those damn picks, move up in the draft...for somebody worth a damn at a position that accounts for 42% of our offense.
 
Top