Grading the 2012 Seahawks (Seattle PI)

[ivotuk]

"Kam Chancellor (31) | safety | grade: A-

One of the most physical defensive backs in the league, his most memorable highlight of the year, perhaps, was a huge hit against San Francisco's Vernon Davis that -- despite being legal on replays -- drew a personal-foul flag. Chancellor finished the regular season as the team's second-best tackler with 69, and recovered two fumbles as a starter. He was also named a second alternate for the Pro Bowl."


http://blog.seattlepi.com/football/2013/01/15/grading-the-2012-seattle-seahawks/#9353-1

 

[Missing_Clink]

well that grader certainly is generous

 

[Hawknballs]

wow. Been a lot of negativity here for Kam. Lets not forget his supporting cast for his portion of the field is a group of very young linebackers, and Kam himself isn't a veteran just yet.

 

[Rainger]

What a crap that is all you can do is look at pictures I could not see any grades.

 

[onanygivensunday]

What a crap that is all you can do is look at pictures I could not see any grades.

They are right below the pictures... along with a short write-up for each player.

Try using a different browser... that may help.

Overall, I thought that most of the grades were a bit high.

 

[HawkFan72]

This list is a joke.

Bottom Line: Anyone who was a starter or played significant time without injury gets a B or higher!

Hooray!

(And they don't even have a picture of Gus Bradley under Gus Bradley. Come on. This is the Seattle PI?) This is like a Bleacher Report article.

 

[jlwaters1]

One also has to question the validity of the peice when several errors are written, such as _ Golden Tate was a rookie in 2011, (Rookie in 2010), That Carpenter was starting at RG when he's never played RG.