James in PA
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6,632
- Reaction score
- 7,644
They must really, really like the guys they already have.


I like the young guards on the roster too but that doesn't mean you stop adding talent.They must really, really like the guys they already have.
![]()
Thing is, there isn’t much left in the cupboard at OG just a Week in FA. Not getting Fries or one of the other two has pretty much sealed the reality that there will need to be a focus on interior OLinemen in the draft. At this stage which of any FA is worth trying to sign?We should just assume he's not going to do sh*t in FA and is going to try and Draft his way out of this mess at OL.
Yeah I'd rather not overpay for average/decent and injured Oline players when we have several young guys that might excel with a new scheme and Oline coach.He will not overpay when he has guys that have a chance to develop if coached up. We need O line but we also need CB's, TE's, LB's and Safety depth.
I don't disagree but you need some level of talent to go along with better run blocking and scheme design.If you’re in a pass happy offense and don’t give the defense any resemblance of running the ball, you’re setting the OL up for failure, which is what Grubb did. Consistently in shotgun, and the OL on their heels all year instead of being aggressive taking it to the DL to set up the pass. It doesn’t work in NFL.
I don't disagree but you need some level of talent to go along with better run blocking and scheme design.
Best case scenario the Seahawks OL gels and they become an NFL average unit. Some would be happy with that but I wouldn't. Why? Because if you look at the NFC rosters lets compare.
These are the 2025 NFC playoff teams and their pre draft projected OL line ups. Bolded players are new 2025 additions.
Commanders: L. Tunsil, N. Algretti, T. Bladasz, T. Cosmi, A. Willie
Lions: T. Decker, G. Glasgow, F. Ragnow, C. Mahogany, P. Sewel.
Eagles: J. Mailata, L, Dickerson, C. Jurgens, T. Steen, L. Johnson
Vikings: C. Darrisaw, B. Brandel, R. Kelly, W. Fries, B. O'Neil
Rams: A. Jackson, S. Avila, B. Limmer, K. Dotson, R. Harvenstein
Bucs: T. Wirfs, B. Bredeson, G. Barton, C. Mauch, L. Goedeke
Packers: R. Walker, A. Banks, E. Jenkins, S. Rhyan, Z. Tom
No one is saying these OL units are perfect but the Seahawks are nowhere on the level of some these OLs. Also many of these teams may draft OL in the 2025 draft that may push some of these players in backup roles. That level of depth the Seahawks could only dream of for their offensive line.
You find that hard?............Finding good o-line players are right up there with finding the G spot.
He might be saying Schneider's wife is "frustrated"You find that hard?............
IMO Haynes is going to develop into a good guard. Laumea shows promise as well. Bradford looks like back up material.Yeah I'd rather not overpay for average/decent and injured Oline players when we have several young guys that might excel with a new scheme and Oline coach.
Can't judge Bradford and Haynes when they had Huff and Grubb setting them up for failure. Even if they look just average that's probably better than having a good guard with injury questions soaking up cap space
I'm hoping Kubiak and crew came in - looked at film of what we already had - and decided they could make a serviceable line out of the pieces. I'm hoping Grubb et al were just so awful that a coaching upgrade can have us be just ACCEPTABLE or DECENT.Yeah I'd rather not overpay for average/decent and injured Oline players when we have several young guys that might excel with a new scheme and Oline coach.
Can't judge Bradford and Haynes when they had Huff and Grubb setting them up for failure. Even if they look just average that's probably better than having a good guard with injury questions soaking up cap space
Timeless, unchallenged wisdom... oops, well, there was that year when 7th Rounder Michael Bowie and UDFA Alvin Bailey, two rookies who were tackles in college made the team. Bailey in particular got plenty of snaps. It wasn't ideal, but the team managed to win anyway. All the way to winning SB48. Yeah, that was 2013.This team is, for the most part, built to win now. That's what makes these question marks along the O line so frustrating. We've all seen time and time again where dumpster diving gets us. Relying on rookies along the IOL is not ideal for a team trying to win now.
That is my projection as well but that is going to take time and JS doesn't have time on his side as many of the rookie contracts are starting to come up when he made the philosophical change with the draft a few years ago.IMO Haynes is going to develop into a good guard. Laumea shows promise as well. Bradford looks like back up material.