Eskridge vs Humphrey- JS issue

ScottishHawk84

Active member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
817
Reaction score
194
I’ve not seen anything from Eskridge to make me think he’s going to be a mainstay in the team..Humphrey, who was on the board when we chose Eskridge, on the other hand could’ve been our starting center for several years. JS has made several poor decisions in free agency and in the draft for the last few years. How many more bad years do we give him?
 

mistaowen

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2010
Messages
6,549
Reaction score
1,070
Dee altered his route on 2-3 plays tonight that were easy big plays for Lockett too. Taking him over Creed will always be a horrible decision and Dee might figure it out but he’s an older rookie who needed to step up tonight and didn’t.
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
12,922
Reaction score
9,075
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Humphrey has been having an historically great year for a rookie center too.

I'm not going to lie and pretend I was calling for him when the pick came up, but I remember him being a popular name on here in the pre-draft process.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
11,682
Reaction score
3,301
Richardson was fragile, Eskridge is a china doll that is always broken.

Bad pick, worse still a stupid pick when the team needed a C who could actually block.

Not even relevant tonight or last week either.

In fact if he plays in a game it’s a miracle.
 

balakoth

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
1,329
Reaction score
434
ScottishHawk84":3cuj9fa9 said:
I’ve not seen anything from Eskridge to make me think he’s going to be a mainstay in the team..Humphrey, who was on the board when we chose Eskridge, on the other hand could’ve been our starting center for several years. JS has made several poor decisions in free agency and in the draft for the last few years. How many more bad years do we give him?

You were upset Russ threw him a jump ball at 5'9 in double coverage vs the easy open swain? Just curious?
 

balakoth

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
1,329
Reaction score
434
jammerhawk":3i6ho555 said:
Richardson was fragile, Eskridge is a china doll that is always broken.

Bad pick, worse still a stupid pick when the team needed a C who could actually block.

Not even relevant tonight or last week either.

In fact if he plays in a game it’s a miracle.

Always broken? He took a hard hit to the back of the head in a helmet.. his only injury...This board is beyond insane
 

balakoth

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
1,329
Reaction score
434
Oh my bad.. 8k posts some how makes people in the "know" without any basic logic.... typical since the first board. ROFL
 
K

K.J WRIGHT

Guest
Thought you were leaving. Dollars to donuts you're a commie.
 

TraderGary

Active member
Joined
May 25, 2020
Messages
408
Reaction score
170
ScottishHawk84":3rwom05w said:
I’ve not seen anything from Eskridge to make me think he’s going to be a mainstay in the team..Humphrey, who was on the board when we chose Eskridge, on the other hand could’ve been our starting center for several years. JS has made several poor decisions in free agency and in the draft for the last few years. How many more bad years do we give him?
Well since Pete has final say on all Personnel decisions, what makes you so sure it was JS's pick and not Pete's? I don't think any of us here really know who's been pulling the strings on draft day.

And yes I agree with you, it was a ridiculously poor decision to select Eskridge when we really needed a center and Humphrey was there for the taking.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,648
Reaction score
13,127
Location
Delaware
balakoth":3d19pes4 said:
Oh my bad.. 8k posts some how makes people in the "know" without any basic logic.... typical since the first board. ROFL

Stop having a meltdown. So self-conscious about post counts, of all things.

Good lord.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,648
Reaction score
13,127
Location
Delaware
Pocic coming in immediately calmed the line down, and they started playing better.

I'd like to see them invest in tackle prior to center. I think it's the higher priority.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,489
Reaction score
3,457
Maelstrom787":1kz048ro said:
Pocic coming in immediately calmed the line down, and they started playing better.

I'd like to see them invest in tackle prior to center. I think it's the higher priority.

Still defending Pocic I see. Sure tackle is a higher priority, but lets not pretend that Center hasent been an issue for years now. Tackle is a higher priority as a center was a higher priority than a luxury, unneeded #3 WR that hasent worked out at all. Just have confidence in our front office to do the wrong thing most of the time and you wont end up as disappointed.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,648
Reaction score
13,127
Location
Delaware
pittpnthrs":19kj2pub said:
Maelstrom787":19kj2pub said:
Pocic coming in immediately calmed the line down, and they started playing better.

I'd like to see them invest in tackle prior to center. I think it's the higher priority.

Still defending Pocic I see. Sure tackle is a higher priority, but lets not pretend that Center hasent been an issue for years now. Tackle is a higher priority as a center was a higher priority than a luxury, unneeded #3 WR that hasent worked out at all. Just have confidence in our front office to do the wrong thing most of the time and you wont end up as disappointed.

Feel free to deny what I said, but it's true.

Teams record would be the exact same with Creed, pretty much guaranteed.

Tackle is the existential threat to the offense.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,489
Reaction score
3,457
Maelstrom787":3mpln1gw said:
pittpnthrs":3mpln1gw said:
Maelstrom787":3mpln1gw said:
Pocic coming in immediately calmed the line down, and they started playing better.

I'd like to see them invest in tackle prior to center. I think it's the higher priority.

Still defending Pocic I see. Sure tackle is a higher priority, but lets not pretend that Center hasent been an issue for years now. Tackle is a higher priority as a center was a higher priority than a luxury, unneeded #3 WR that hasent worked out at all. Just have confidence in our front office to do the wrong thing most of the time and you wont end up as disappointed.

Feel free to deny what I said, but it's true.

Teams record would be the exact same with Creed, pretty much guaranteed.

Tackle is the existential threat to the offense.

At least Creed would have contributed during the season, by keeping Russ upright more so than Pocic ever could and would have been a mainstay for years to come on the line. Eskridge had a chance to shine last night when the team needed him to and he failed miserably. Taking him before Creed was a travesty.
 

WmHBonney

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
3,048
Reaction score
1,505
balakoth":2dowabjm said:
ScottishHawk84":2dowabjm said:
I’ve not seen anything from Eskridge to make me think he’s going to be a mainstay in the team..Humphrey, who was on the board when we chose Eskridge, on the other hand could’ve been our starting center for several years. JS has made several poor decisions in free agency and in the draft for the last few years. How many more bad years do we give him?

You were upset Russ threw him a jump ball at 5'9 in double coverage vs the easy open swain? Just curious?

Yep. I noticed this too. Swain was wide open. Gotta throw that hero ball though.
 

Latest posts

Top