CALIHAWK1":3ue8zdf9 said:
And when for whatever the reason he was our fourth reciever he did what was asked. Blocking etc. When Harvin returned he was our fifth and I acknowledge that and had Sidney not been hurt he may or may not have even been on the roster. He was a good STer. Im failing to see what your point is
My point was that rather than Lockette having "turned it around" he did what he has always done (not much of anything), and only had the opportunity to be 4th on the depth chart (let alone on the team at all) because two guys got injured and the Hawks had a rare miss in drafting. That's all I was saying.
CALIHAWK1":3ue8zdf9 said:
or where I said he was a Pro Bowl level player since returning here.
LOLWHUT? I accused you of this where? Unnecessary hyperbole, IMO.
CALIHAWK1":3ue8zdf9 said:
We are a run first team so its not like we are asking our 4th, 5th reciever to do a ton as if we were Denver.
Never made any claims about this either. Depending on what happens in FA, if Harvin is out for a substantial amount of time again, and if the Hawks don't draft any WRs or have too much faith in the development of their young WRs he might even make the team again. He might even shatter his career record and average a reception every other game. It's certainly possible, I just don't think it's likely. To be clear, I'm not rooting against him either, I've just been on the carousel with him before (as have Hawks fans, incidentally).
CALIHAWK1":3ue8zdf9 said:
I also hardly think you are the only one who watched every game this year. Pointing that out I l'dol. I think 99.999999% of this board watched every game.
I said it because I'm a 9ers fan, so the expectation is that I wouldn't have. If a Hawks fan was talking about a bottom-of-the-depth chart 9ers player I'd give their opinion more weight too if they had actually watched all the games rather than just the occasional matchup. I was pointing out that in viewership I'm THE SAME as everyone else here, not different.
