JayhawkMike
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2016
- Messages
- 2,577
- Reaction score
- 1,446
I’ll post a few without violating board rules. Overall though they have been poor and in my opinion deservedly so.
endzorn":2zv0w5c8 said:Obviously the jury will be out for a couple years. Admittedly I’m skeptical of this front office because they’ve done poorly for the last five drafts and this is no different. I think Green will be a steal in a couple years, but the rest of this class is underwhelming, to be kind.
Dissly might end up being a Mack Strong type of fan favorite, but when they took him I thought there were so many people still available who could help us.
I still think Penny was a reach. If there was consistent tape of him lowering his pads and breaking tackles I’d be pumped, but he runs straight up and NFL talent won’t let that go unpunished.
Dickson may end up being the most valuable pick.
Jones might end up being a solid starter in the same vein that Sean Locklear was an average starter for a few years under Holmgren.
Griffin...I love the kid, I love his production, I love his tape, I love his workouts, I love his heart. Still have to prove that NFL offenses can’t exploit a missing hand. I suspect he’s going to surprise skeptics, but it is still a question.
Overall I think the value and execution is in the C- to D+ range.
JayhawkMike":26kr6hks said:So, some unbiased third party grades:
Business Insider (Who?) D+
http://www.businessinsider.com/nfl-draf ... sus-2018-4
SB Nation C
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2018/4/29/ ... rs-results
Bleacher Report C
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2773 ... every-team
Fantasy Pros (Who again) D
https://www.fantasypros.com/2018/04/201 ... -32-teams/
CBS D+
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/new ... top-marks/
Sports Illustrated C
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/new ... top-marks/
NFL.com Overall a C. A D on Penny (Worst overall grade they gave was a C to us and Oakland)
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... l-32-teams
On most drafts we were worst rated. The amount of justification here is funny to see. Our draft sucked.
DomeHawk":2azddx3x said:JayhawkMike":2azddx3x said:So, some unbiased third party grades:
Business Insider (Who?) D+
http://www.businessinsider.com/nfl-draf ... sus-2018-4
SB Nation C
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2018/4/29/ ... rs-results
Bleacher Report C
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2773 ... every-team
Fantasy Pros (Who again) D
https://www.fantasypros.com/2018/04/201 ... -32-teams/
CBS D+
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/new ... top-marks/
Sports Illustrated C
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/new ... top-marks/
NFL.com Overall a C. A D on Penny (Worst overall grade they gave was a C to us and Oakland)
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... l-32-teams
On most drafts we were worst rated. The amount of justification here is funny to see. Our draft sucked.
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the writers diss us on our best draft in recent history?
olyfan63":1h3p8qp7 said:Wow, Rang is the only one who actually seems to understand the 'Hawks approach. Refreshing compared to the parroting most others are doing.
Penny will be lightning in a bottle on this team. Dissley and Dickson and ditchin (Graham) will be key in our return to ground game dominance.
In addition to pro bowlers Brown and Britt, we have enough O-Line athlete on this team in development and we should have an NFL-average OL overall next year, especially with Cable out and Solari in. Bringing in a bunch of O-Line rookies in the draft would have been pointless. We brought in Pocic last year and Ifedi the year before as high-round draft picks, among others.
Anajimmc":2ub5xvna said:Can't forget Emory Hunt.
http://footballgameplan.com/2018-nfl-draft-grades-seattle-seahawks/