original poster
New member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2014
- Messages
- 3,201
- Reaction score
- 1
I don’t buy it at all, personally.
sdog1981":v0k614eo said:Well a head coach cost the Buccaneers 2 first rounders and 2 second rounders so GM should be at least that right?
original poster":23ehjbzm said:sdog1981":23ehjbzm said:Well a head coach cost the Buccaneers 2 first rounders and 2 second rounders so GM should be at least that right?
To be fair I’d say a HC is more valuable than a GM.
Head coaches get paid typically considerably more than GM’s.
Bobblehead":1cnnp9y8 said:JS apparently is a Packer share holder..
This argument is misguided, and out of touch with how the team is run.joeseahawks":1q91wnb2 said:Maybe I'm alone, but I would welcome a JS departure.
I don't really understand the rational to keep JS around. Yes, he had a few great years with Wilson, Doug, Kam, Sherm and some great Free Agent signings (Bennet, Cliff, ...).
But, please look at his last 4-5 drafts. I wouldn't be surprised if this was one of the worst in the NFL in that span.
We want to get ride of players, as soon as their performances drift. We want to keep a GM around, who has been extremely poor in the last 4-5 years?
Time for John to move to the Packers. And hopefully we can get some draft picks for him.
West TX Hawk":237i55zo said:Let him go but get quality compensation in return. It's sadly our only chance at getting rid of Bevell, Cable and others because Carroll will never change a damn thing.
A new GM with fresh ideas and draft strategies would be welcome also. I'm tired of watching trade downs just so we can reach for red flags. The last 5 drafts as a whole have been subpar at best. Perhaps we can do better.