I like Frank a lot. But there's just no way he's in the category of those guys. I know that this the market etc. but he's just not worth 20 plus mil. Just my own opinion, but at that type of $ it's time to see if a team will bite on a good trade.
SoulfishHawk":1y5zy54h said:I like Frank a lot. But there's just no way he's in the category of those guys. I know that this the market etc. but he's just not worth 20 plus mil. Just my own opinion, but at that type of $ it's time to see if a team will bite on a good trade.
Sgt. Largent":ywa10wnb said:DomeHawk":ywa10wnb said:Trading proven players for unproven draft picks is gambling.
The old adage "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" rings true here.
Not for 21-22M it doesn't.........especially if your intention is to also try to extend Bobby and Jarran over the next year.
Thus why John said yesterday that this decision has been keeping him up at night, and also why the trade rumors are flying. Aaron Donald makes 22M, do you really put Frank in the same category as Aaron Donald?
Nope. Clark's a top 10 DE, but IMO I couldn't feel good about paying him almost the same money as Khalil Mack and Aaron Donald, he's just not at that level. So unfortunately like John and Pete are doing you have to listen to trade offers and see if you can find the right package to let a player like Frank go.
Sgt. Largent":1wjzhiq2 said:SoulfishHawk":1wjzhiq2 said:I like Frank a lot. But there's just no way he's in the category of those guys. I know that this the market etc. but he's just not worth 20 plus mil. Just my own opinion, but at that type of $ it's time to see if a team will bite on a good trade.
Luckily there's multiple teams now reported to be interested in Clark, and probably will be more come draft day. Always helps drive up the price.
I want Frank to stay, because without him our pass rush is downright abysmal. But that's now. I assume if we trade him we'd use that 1st rounder to draft a stud pass rusher, AS WELL AS sign one of the vet D-lineman out there right now like Suh or Ansah......for half the cost of Frank.
Still not a great pass rush, but it's not as bleak and what's on our roster now.
DomeHawk":3p04ah2v said:Trading proven players for unproven draft picks is gambling.
The old adage "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" rings true here.
MontanaHawk05":1n7zd4n5 said:Sgt. Largent":1n7zd4n5 said:DomeHawk":1n7zd4n5 said:Trading proven players for unproven draft picks is gambling.
The old adage "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" rings true here.
Not for 21-22M it doesn't.........especially if your intention is to also try to extend Bobby and Jarran over the next year.
Thus why John said yesterday that this decision has been keeping him up at night, and also why the trade rumors are flying. Aaron Donald makes 22M, do you really put Frank in the same category as Aaron Donald?
Nope. Clark's a top 10 DE, but IMO I couldn't feel good about paying him almost the same money as Khalil Mack and Aaron Donald, he's just not at that level. So unfortunately like John and Pete are doing you have to listen to trade offers and see if you can find the right package to let a player like Frank go.
But again, the tough part is, Clark isn't an exception. This is the market for very good DE's now. If our next top pass rusher hits the same level of production as Clark, he's not going to be cheaper.
So if Pete and John aren't willing to pay this level of money for very-good-but-not-quite-Mack pass rushers, we're basically talking about no second contracts anymore, unless they just aren't that good. The only defensive ends we'll carry will be the ones on their first contracts, and how likely will they be to develop into elite players in that span of time?
MontanaHawk05":pqczomfo said:Sgt. Largent":pqczomfo said:DomeHawk":pqczomfo said:Trading proven players for unproven draft picks is gambling.
The old adage "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" rings true here.
Not for 21-22M it doesn't.........especially if your intention is to also try to extend Bobby and Jarran over the next year.
Thus why John said yesterday that this decision has been keeping him up at night, and also why the trade rumors are flying. Aaron Donald makes 22M, do you really put Frank in the same category as Aaron Donald?
Nope. Clark's a top 10 DE, but IMO I couldn't feel good about paying him almost the same money as Khalil Mack and Aaron Donald, he's just not at that level. So unfortunately like John and Pete are doing you have to listen to trade offers and see if you can find the right package to let a player like Frank go.
But again, the tough part is, Clark isn't an exception. This is the market for very good DE's now. If our next top pass rusher hits the same level of production as Clark, he's not going to be cheaper.
So if Pete and John aren't willing to pay this level of money for very-good-but-not-quite-Mack pass rushers, we're basically talking about no second contracts anymore, unless they just aren't that good. The only defensive ends we'll carry will be the ones on their first contracts, and how likely will they be to develop into elite players in that span of time?
Hawkpower":140c0ohc said:MontanaHawk05":140c0ohc said:Sgt. Largent":140c0ohc said:DomeHawk":140c0ohc said:Trading proven players for unproven draft picks is gambling.
The old adage "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" rings true here.
Not for 21-22M it doesn't.........especially if your intention is to also try to extend Bobby and Jarran over the next year.
Thus why John said yesterday that this decision has been keeping him up at night, and also why the trade rumors are flying. Aaron Donald makes 22M, do you really put Frank in the same category as Aaron Donald?
Nope. Clark's a top 10 DE, but IMO I couldn't feel good about paying him almost the same money as Khalil Mack and Aaron Donald, he's just not at that level. So unfortunately like John and Pete are doing you have to listen to trade offers and see if you can find the right package to let a player like Frank go.
But again, the tough part is, Clark isn't an exception. This is the market for very good DE's now. If our next top pass rusher hits the same level of production as Clark, he's not going to be cheaper.
So if Pete and John aren't willing to pay this level of money for very-good-but-not-quite-Mack pass rushers, we're basically talking about no second contracts anymore, unless they just aren't that good. The only defensive ends we'll carry will be the ones on their first contracts, and how likely will they be to develop into elite players in that span of time?
These are the type of tough decisions that have to take place on teams that have to pay QB's top dollar.
Just a reality moving forward. There will be casualties unfortunately.
Anajimmc":8hkuxsbk said:It was interesting to hear an interview with a KC sports radio host. I'm entrenched in looking at things from a Seahawk perspective. Hearing the KC take it's a deal that could work for both parties, and is not at all unfeasible. In fact they are concerned that Indy would be in a position to out bid them for Clark. Ah a bidding war, wouldn't that be nice.
Seymour":ov01ch2q said:Anajimmc":ov01ch2q said:It was interesting to hear an interview with a KC sports radio host. I'm entrenched in looking at things from a Seahawk perspective. Hearing the KC take it's a deal that could work for both parties, and is not at all unfeasible. In fact they are concerned that Indy would be in a position to out bid them for Clark. Ah a bidding war, wouldn't that be nice.
With how we have gotten fleeced on several trades, that would be awesome and about time if that happens!! :2thumbs:
Largent80":2srvfl5c said:Jarran Reed had 10.5 sacks from the DT position. Clark had 13 from the outside. Who's more valuable?
That's easy. If you get value, G'BYE Clark, and your contract demands.
Largent80":2kwzgdod said:Jarran Reed had 10.5 sacks from the DT position. Clark had 13 from the outside. Who's more valuable?
That's easy. If you get value, G'BYE Clark, and your contract demands.