IndyHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 10,027
- Reaction score
- 3,652
I'm not worried, Mac doesn't play down to a backup like Pete would.
Come on man. That was REFS trying to steer that game. Hawks were in control the entire time. Just typical Refs trying to make a prime time game close. It gets really old. And it's very common these days.It took a last second FG to beat them last time, and that was with both Spoon and Love in the lineup. Now we could be without EJones this game.
McBride is a good TE and Harrison has found his confidence.
Yes this should be a game we win but it's a divisional game, so we'll see.
That's actually a good point.Glad they told us early in the week. Ha
You’ll thank me later.Don't forget. It's Jerhawk the reverse-psychology master-bait'or.![]()
Remember also that stupid-as-hell BS penalty that the ref gave JSN where he was being tackled but instead was called for "holding" on what could've been a game-clinching TD by Charbs?Come on man. That was REFS trying to steer that game. Hawks were in control the entire time. Just typical Refs trying to make a prime time game close. It gets really old. And it's very common these days.
A couple garbage time TDs. Arizona had 253 total yards in that game.
Defense and special teams did. The offense definitely relaxed in the second half, though.Washington game. That's exactly what they did. Foot on throat for 4 quarters. That was nice to see.
I give the O a pass on that. After all, when you go into the 2d half with a big lead you're most important strategy is to kill the clock. We did score in the 3d quarter, just not the 4th.Defense and special teams did. The offense definitely relaxed in the second half, though.
Did they? He was still throwing passes when they were up 31-7Defense and special teams did. The offense definitely relaxed in the second half, though.
A lot of "come from behind with a huge deficit to win the game in the last moment" games can be traced back to this exact behavior in the second half. I get it - run a lot, make the clock run faster, give the opponent less time to stage a comeback. I just believe that thinking is a bit old and stale for the modern NFL and that it shouldn't automatically be the default behavior or mindset that teams drop into when they go up big in the first half.I give the O a pass on that. After all, when you go into the 2d half with a big lead you're most important strategy is to kill the clock. We did score in the 3d quarter, just not the 4th.
In addition, they needed all that work on the running game. Good time to do it with a big lead.
"Throwing passes" is so vague. It's not that simple. The play calling and offensive formations changed a lot in the second half. It's not even an example of "there's passing, and then passing"...it's more like, there's passing, and then Passing, and then PASSING, and then !!PASSING!!, and then OMFG WE ARE PASSING TO KILL, RAPE, PILLAGE, AND PLUNDER!Did they? He was still throwing passes when they were up 31-7
We'll barbecue him.Briskett is a good player for sure. But our pass rush, good luck kid.
I relish a good analogy, but Im not sure this one cuts the mustard.This game has me shaking like a whore at a hotdog stand.
The Cardinals are not to be taken lightly