Read further guy...I said I hope he plays well. Because unlike you I cheer for all player on my team. I'm glad you like brooks, but if you did so much then why haven't you seen they brought him off pup?
Ok, 'guy'. Clear this conversation isn't worth continuing. I saw they brought him off pup the hour they did it. Anybody who knows the Hawks this year understands that depth at ILB and the interior line is our weak link. Apparently to you, we are perfectly fine with an aging HOFer (older players get injured) and a starter coming off of a serious knee injury.
Pete saying ' I can't imagine him [Brooks]not being on the field week 1...' is classic Pete optimism. It would be foolish to assume Brooks could just jump in and pick up a starters workload week 1. And it would be foolish for the Hawks to put him in that position. Same with Adams. So again. Bush needs to play a starter role when he's there. We didn't sign him to be a Rhattigan or Burr Kirvin or O'Connell. They are clear depth pieces and their combined contract numbers for 2023 don't add up to what Seattle gave Bush for the year. And i'm guessing this is news to you, but he was signed before Wagner was a certainty and before they had any idea whether or not Brooks would be back. He was signed, in their eyes, to be a starter. Good for us if our regulars are on the field.
Newsflash - You can have more than 1 starter at a position. We have 3 starters at safety for only 2 spots. We have more starters at CB than slots. If Bush is the player he was pre injury, then we have 3 starters at ILB.
But you knew that already.