SNDavidson
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,925
- Reaction score
- 815
I still believe in you Bruce.
kearly":xc03tptb said:Doesn't it stay in the bloodstream for a while? Could have been that all these PED events occurred a while ago and the positive test results are trickling in just recently. Seems to me like the damage is done, we just have to see how much more there is. Obviously, these guys aren't going to double down on Adderall tomorrow after seeing all these suspensions.
kearly":sfeph20i said:Doesn't it stay in the bloodstream for a while? Could have been that all these PED events occurred a while ago and the positive test results are trickling in just recently. Seems to me like the damage is done, we just have to see how much more there is. Obviously, these guys aren't going to double down on Adderall tomorrow after seeing all these suspensions.
Assuming he JUST tested positive during the last week or so. That's a LARGE assumption because none of us have any idea when he tested positive. It could have been early in the season, not in the past couple days.bestfightstory":mu8x5asl said:McGruff":mu8x5asl said:Lets see . . . Bruceut on 20 pounds of muscle in three months with no sacrifice to speed or agility?
You guys really think this is adderall?
Good to see somebody is thinking clearly.
Bakergirl":3b9ugy52 said:kearly":3b9ugy52 said:Doesn't it stay in the bloodstream for a while? Could have been that all these PED events occurred a while ago and the positive test results are trickling in just recently. Seems to me like the damage is done, we just have to see how much more there is. Obviously, these guys aren't going to double down on Adderall tomorrow after seeing all these suspensions.
Half life of Adderall is 10 hours an adult bloodstream, but it can be detected 3-4 days after use by a urine test.
QFTwarden":itad03np said:We know nothing. It amazes me how strong the opinions are with such limited access to factsbestfightstory":itad03np said:We don't KNOW it was Adderall. It could have been a specialty roids cocktail or a blunt or he could have been roofied by Moffitt.
What? Is someone else being suspended that the rest of us don't know about yet?LoneHawkFan":c0l5dyn6 said:when we strap up for week 5 this year we will have endured 8 out of our last 10 games with a starting defender suspended for Adderall use.
McNair is the assistant coach to whom I referred above. His lawsuit is still ongoing. The judge made an initial ruling that there appeared to be cause for it to continue. He also said he would have the NCAA emails released pending the NCAA's right to appeal within thirty days. Unsurprisingly, they did appeal. So we are basically in hurry up and wait mode at this point.12th_Bob":znm4uxrc said:Lol, not to derail this thread but the NCAA is a joke IMO. A year ago or so they hit Boise State football for some violation that amounted to 63 players receiving benefits to the monetary value of $4,934. The monetary violation related to a housing issue and here is the kicker, BSU was working with the NCAA to resolve this issue for months but the NCAA alleged more violations a few days prior to a game against Oregon. The violations amounted to players allowing incoming recruits to sleep on their couches prior to enrollment during summer session.
In regards to USC, the NCAA spent 4 years with a fine tooth comb to nab Reggie Bush and vilified running backs assistant coach Todd McNaire who successfully sued the NCAA for lost future earnings. The entire episode reads as the NCAA investigators had an ax to grind against USC just to make an example out of them. I think whatever is going on with Oregon is similar and a joke as far as I'm concerned.
http://voices.idahostatesman.com/2011/0 ... eated_more
http://content.usatoday.com/communities ... ZfA-LWyCSo
http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-footba ... cious-ncaa
Other than just being too lazy to look it up (sorrysc85sis":245u61p3 said:McNair is the assistant coach to whom I referred above. His lawsuit is still ongoing. The judge made an initial ruling that there appeared to be cause for it to continue. He also said he would have the NCAA emails released pending the NCAA's right to appeal within thirty days. Unsurprisingly, they did appeal. So we are basically in hurry up and wait mode at this point.12th_Bob":245u61p3 said:Lol, not to derail this thread but the NCAA is a joke IMO. A year ago or so they hit Boise State football for some violation that amounted to 63 players receiving benefits to the monetary value of $4,934. The monetary violation related to a housing issue and here is the kicker, BSU was working with the NCAA to resolve this issue for months but the NCAA alleged more violations a few days prior to a game against Oregon. The violations amounted to players allowing incoming recruits to sleep on their couches prior to enrollment during summer session.
In regards to USC, the NCAA spent 4 years with a fine tooth comb to nab Reggie Bush and vilified running backs assistant coach Todd McNaire who successfully sued the NCAA for lost future earnings. The entire episode reads as the NCAA investigators had an ax to grind against USC just to make an example out of them. I think whatever is going on with Oregon is similar and a joke as far as I'm concerned.
http://voices.idahostatesman.com/2011/0 ... eated_more
http://content.usatoday.com/communities ... ZfA-LWyCSo
http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-footba ... cious-ncaa
As you can imagine, many USC alums, fans and the university itself are quite interested in the case. Of course, by the time it's all said and done, sanctions will probably be over.
NinerLifer":1dri9g97 said:Not sure why some on this board are trying to take ease in the possibility that it wasn't and that it could have been a steroid or common street drug. That wouldn't be better guys.
SE174":3ra1r55m said:As has been previously mentioned but failed to be acknowledged by some people in this thread, adderall offers no benefit to adding muscle weight. It's a stimulant that improves, focus, energy and attention. If adderall was indeed what he took, he more than likely took it for the ATL game since he was thrust into a starter role and a lot more pressure/attention was focused on him. Clearly, it didn't help him.
I doubt it. The NCAA isn't filled with the, "oh, we're sorry we were over zealous" types. Still, it could help in the court of public opinion.gargantual":21143kfs said:Other than just being too lazy to look it up (sorrysc85sis":21143kfs said:McNair is the assistant coach to whom I referred above. His lawsuit is still ongoing. The judge made an initial ruling that there appeared to be cause for it to continue. He also said he would have the NCAA emails released pending the NCAA's right to appeal within thirty days. Unsurprisingly, they did appeal. So we are basically in hurry up and wait mode at this point.12th_Bob":21143kfs said:Lol, not to derail this thread but the NCAA is a joke IMO. A year ago or so they hit Boise State football for some violation that amounted to 63 players receiving benefits to the monetary value of $4,934. The monetary violation related to a housing issue and here is the kicker, BSU was working with the NCAA to resolve this issue for months but the NCAA alleged more violations a few days prior to a game against Oregon. The violations amounted to players allowing incoming recruits to sleep on their couches prior to enrollment during summer session.
In regards to USC, the NCAA spent 4 years with a fine tooth comb to nab Reggie Bush and vilified running backs assistant coach Todd McNaire who successfully sued the NCAA for lost future earnings. The entire episode reads as the NCAA investigators had an ax to grind against USC just to make an example out of them. I think whatever is going on with Oregon is similar and a joke as far as I'm concerned.
http://voices.idahostatesman.com/2011/0 ... eated_more
http://content.usatoday.com/communities ... ZfA-LWyCSo
http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-footba ... cious-ncaa
As you can imagine, many USC alums, fans and the university itself are quite interested in the case. Of course, by the time it's all said and done, sanctions will probably be over.), does any of this mean that the findings or rulings or whatever that went against USC could get overturned in the future? Does it mean that the Championship(s?) that was/were invalidated will then be re-instated (or was that just Bush's Heisman?)? It's obvious they can't give back or make up for the other lost Bowl games and taken recruiting opportunities, but at least that would be SOMETHING. If nothing else - validation that they weren't ever crooked in the first place. As Hawks fans that would be nice to shut up all the "cheat" slings that get really old to hear.
Sorry state of affairs this happening if it was all unwarranted, but undeniably fascinating, in that driving-by-an-accident-and-just-having-to-look kind of way.