rcaido
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
- Messages
- 2,394
- Reaction score
- 658
Sgt. Largent":txu11smx said:rcaido":txu11smx said:Its all about the money and if it makes sense to keep them. Do you think Seahawks wanted to take a chance on Sherman after that injury? .
Yes, we would have done what many teams do with big contract players who got hurt or skills have diminished, yet still are valuable leaders and can contribute...........they're offer the chance to re-do their contracts to a lower value so they can stay.
When a player is just flat out cut? Yep, it's about the money, but it's also a sign that there is absolutely NO interest in working things out.
Guarantee you Pete and John will try and work something out with KJ in the off season for him to come back on a prove it deal, or a deal more team friendly. Doesn't mean he'll take it if he can get more money elsewhere, but the good relationship is still there.
Richard made sure to burn that bridge, which is why he signed with SF on a terrible incentive heavy deal and only 7M guaranteed.
Explain Earl then? Why was he not dealt during the offseason? If Seahawks wanted the whole new fresh young defense, why not trade Earl too who had the most distraction of the team last season. Trade him before the draft to build that new young defense.
Again its Sherman's injury & Bennett was too old. As much as you want to blame their attitude its not the case with these two. Also why would Bennett take a paycut if the Eagles are willing to pay his contract. If anything they did Bennett a solid at the time, trading him to a Superbowl team. With Kam & Avril injuries, i dont think they wanted to chance Sherman either. I bet if they can do it all over again they would take Sherman's contract right now since he seem to have recovered from his injury.