3Girls'HawkDad
New member
storm74":3246eemw said:I have Ashton's Blouse and it had semen and maple on it. Jesus guys give it a rest.
CANHawk!!!!
storm74":3246eemw said:I have Ashton's Blouse and it had semen and maple on it. Jesus guys give it a rest.
hawk45":1ejnyv97 said:NJSeaHawk":1ejnyv97 said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/523242642965291008[/tweet]
Peter King comes off as an apologist here. "Trust issues" implies that at some point teams have actually transgressed against him. The fact that 2 teams have unloaded him in his prime is pretty solid evidence that Percy himself is the issue.
(this isn't directed toward you NJ you just posted King's reaction and thanks for that)
pehawk":1cw02xj9 said:DavidSeven's on to something, I like his direction. In fact, I don't believe we actually traded Percy Harvin. I mean, have the Seahawks or Percy confirmed it? No, this is all hearsay.
DavidSeven":1cpqqd6m said:Yeah... that's the last I'm gonna talk about that.
Anyone else oddly excited to get Richardson and Norwood on the field? I don't feel as down about the move as I might have thought I'd be.
DavidSeven":2gbsn8v7 said:Fine, anyone is entitled to believe what they want.
All I know is Golden and Russell have both denied it. Doug denied it. Ashton's GF denied it. It's never been reported by a single legitimized news source. If we want to believe .NET posters have better info than all of them, OK. Not questioning anyone's credibility, but you guys are relaying hearsay from other people's hearsay.
Hasselbeck":3ry7zoae said:Love how all this comes out after he was traded.
Where were all these reports a week ago?
pehawk":2f891ik8 said:Until I see twitter confirmation from Percy, Idzik, Wilson and Pete...this is just rumor mongering. Really guys, there's NO trade.
HAWKFaninBAMA":3q9m3awn said:Any business minede people in here?
Let's look at it in those terms:
OK, "Dead money" is a SUNK COST, meaning we have already lost it there is no reason to worry about it we cant get it back.
If Percy was a problem he could exponentially cause more problems then he is worth and multiply the loss.
If he almost got into a fight with RW and punched Golden, no matter what the circumstances, I believe this was a good move.
Time to move forward..... No point in dwelling on it..... GO HAWKS
DavidSeven":3b7qsyci said:pehawk":3b7qsyci said:DavidSeven's on to something, I like his direction. In fact, I don't believe we actually traded Percy Harvin. I mean, have the Seahawks or Percy confirmed it? No, this is all hearsay.
Yes. That is clearly the same thing as inventing orgy scenarios. Clearly.
I must have missed Adam Schefter's report on that. Would've been a doozy.
hawk45":usy6zdn7 said:HAWKFaninBAMA":usy6zdn7 said:Any business minede people in here?
Let's look at it in those terms:
OK, "Dead money" is a SUNK COST, meaning we have already lost it there is no reason to worry about it we cant get it back.
If Percy was a problem he could exponentially cause more problems then he is worth and multiply the loss.
If he almost got into a fight with RW and punched Golden, no matter what the circumstances, I believe this was a good move.
Time to move forward..... No point in dwelling on it..... GO HAWKS
I see near universal acceptance that unloading Percy was a good move. Folks understand the concept of sunk costs.
It's okay to express shock and frustration that the initial move turned out so poorly on a Seahawk message board the day the news breaks.
slargent4ever":2xo3i1jf said:I have heard from a source that it was actually tate sleeping with russ. Percy is very homophobic and ended up punching tate over it. It was recently brought up again, and they thought russ and Percy were going to throw down.
hawknation2014":mcznavfg said:Other than a bartender supposedly overhearing one player discussing this ridiculous rumor . . . or maybe he heard from someone who heard from someone who heard from someone that they overheard a player discussing this idiotic rumor . . . is that the full extent of your evidence that "the players" believe this rumor to be true? This is exactly why we have a hearsay rule.
pmedic920":2v5aiz6s said:LymonHawk":2v5aiz6s said:On the bright side: I didn't buy a Harvin jersey.
Good minds think alike, or so they say.
HAWKFaninBAMA":310cvak7 said:hawk45":310cvak7 said:HAWKFaninBAMA":310cvak7 said:Any business minede people in here?
Let's look at it in those terms:
OK, "Dead money" is a SUNK COST, meaning we have already lost it there is no reason to worry about it we cant get it back.
If Percy was a problem he could exponentially cause more problems then he is worth and multiply the loss.
If he almost got into a fight with RW and punched Golden, no matter what the circumstances, I believe this was a good move.
Time to move forward..... No point in dwelling on it..... GO HAWKS
I see near universal acceptance that unloading Percy was a good move. Folks understand the concept of sunk costs.
It's okay to express shock and frustration that the initial move turned out so poorly on a Seahawk message board the day the news breaks.
Oh, Im not trying to take that away. I was simply pointing out that the dead money shouldn't be looked at as negative.... Its all part of the process...