gowazzu02":1sgd87mk said:Oh also he's getting roasted at the parlor comedy club in bellevue this sunday.....
That sounds fun. Just checked out tickets..$130/seat...
gowazzu02":1sgd87mk said:Oh also he's getting roasted at the parlor comedy club in bellevue this sunday.....
ctrcat":1zcrboum said:I honestly can't believe the Pro-Bennett viewpoint here. Charles Johnson is younger and has far more career sacks and sacks in the last five years-even came off an injury last year to tally three playoff sacks, and took a MASSIVE paycut. Bennett was stoned by the same Mike Remmers that Miller used in SB50.
Largent80":1vb1ju6s said:I really would like to see the team throw in some incentive things to let him know he's appreciated, outside of the millions he makes every year.
Bigpumpkin":3j59wtt0 said:Largent80":3j59wtt0 said:I really would like to see the team throw in some incentive things to let him know he's appreciated, outside of the millions he makes every year.
That statement is almost hilarious!![]()
ZagHawk":gvz64lie said:gowazzu02":gvz64lie said:Oh also he's getting roasted at the parlor comedy club in bellevue this sunday.....
That sounds fun. Just checked out tickets..$130/seat...ukeface: You can get game tickets for that.
That's because you have no idea what you are talking about.ctrcat":1ygfv9vv said:I honestly can't believe the Pro-Bennett viewpoint here.
Basis4day":bxpwykx0 said:ctrcat":bxpwykx0 said:I honestly can't believe the Pro-Bennett viewpoint here. Charles Johnson is younger and has far more career sacks and sacks in the last five years-even came off an injury last year to tally three playoff sacks, and took a MASSIVE paycut. Bennett was stoned by the same Mike Remmers that Miller used in SB50.
There is more to being a DE/DT than sack numbers.
ctrcat":2nl0hhbr said:That's true. I didn't mean to imply sacks are the end all be all. Bennett is a good player and I actually love his personality. But business is business and by any metric-tackles, forced fumbles, passes defended, etc., Johnson has more impressive numbers and will make FAR less this year even as is. Johnson is known as a good run defender as well when healthy. I'm actually trying to take the side of the Hawks FO here (unless they actually give in).
Archer":3pp7xn4m said:ctrcat":3pp7xn4m said:That's true. I didn't mean to imply sacks are the end all be all. Bennett is a good player and I actually love his personality. But business is business and by any metric-tackles, forced fumbles, passes defended, etc., Johnson has more impressive numbers and will make FAR less this year even as is. Johnson is known as a good run defender as well when healthy. I'm actually trying to take the side of the Hawks FO here (unless they actually give in).
Considering Bennett is one of the most well respected lineman in the league (and this is coming from comments from other players and coaches) as well as the Seahawks FO, I don't think you have any clue what you are talking about. I highly suggest watching actual game tape to see how incredibly disruptive and valuable Bennett is.
He most certainly deserves to make more than he currently is, however based on his age, I'm not sure he will get it from us.
The same Bennett that NE discusses being the only one giving them problems in the NFL Films highlights of the game?ctrcat":1z3dhb5a said:I honestly can't believe the Pro-Bennett viewpoint here. Charles Johnson is younger and has far more career sacks and sacks in the last five years-even came off an injury last year to tally three playoff sacks, and took a MASSIVE paycut. Bennett was stoned by the same Mike Remmers that Miller used in SB50.
Laloosh":2pgjw0yk said:The same Bennett that NE discusses being the only one giving them problems in the NFL Films highlights of the game?ctrcat":2pgjw0yk said:I honestly can't believe the Pro-Bennett viewpoint here. Charles Johnson is younger and has far more career sacks and sacks in the last five years-even came off an injury last year to tally three playoff sacks, and took a MASSIVE paycut. Bennett was stoned by the same Mike Remmers that Miller used in SB50.
ctrcat":18hkth5n said:Laloosh":18hkth5n said:The same Bennett that NE discusses being the only one giving them problems in the NFL Films highlights of the game?ctrcat":18hkth5n said:I honestly can't believe the Pro-Bennett viewpoint here. Charles Johnson is younger and has far more career sacks and sacks in the last five years-even came off an injury last year to tally three playoff sacks, and took a MASSIVE paycut. Bennett was stoned by the same Mike Remmers that Miller used in SB50.
Again, Bennett is a good player, personality, and even analyst. I'll even submit to the fact that my opinion means jack on this topic. But for the record my opinion was strictly on the "Pro-giving more $$$ to Bennett", not anti anything Bennett. Cheers.
bjornanderson21":2ut8jvpj said:Not a reason to be worried yet. We know he's unhappy with his deal so why would he show up when he doesn't even have to?
Not only did he take the correct approach last year, but he also saw the effect it had on Kam when he came back and wasn't in prime condition. I'm no more worried about Bennett than i was about Walter Jones.
Agreed and agreed.Wolfepack":2ut8jvpj said:Mike has shared that he is keeping to what he believes will lead to as much longevity in this sport as possible. For him, that means training in a particular way. He did it last offseason. He's doing it this offseason. And don't be surprised if he does it every offseason for the rest of his career.