B.J. Daniels released by 49ers

Status
Not open for further replies.

bbsplitter

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
681
Reaction score
23
Should we pick him up? T-jack is only 1 year contract right? Id rather have a long term back up locked up at a cheap price than John Lotulelie on the roster...
 

Sarlacc83

Active member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,109
Reaction score
1
Location
Portland, OR
Great idea. TJ is not cheap and he's looked turrible. We should cut him for the 49ers' chump change.
 
OP
OP
bbsplitter

bbsplitter

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
681
Reaction score
23
Sarlacc83":b9n2qri0 said:
Great idea. TJ is not cheap and he's looked turrible. We should cut him for the 49ers' chump change.

...TJ's played awesome and is on a 1 year contract... Which means next year we are going to be likely competing against teams who would possibly pay him to be a possible starter. And I dont see us matching said money for him to be our backup.
 

Throwdown

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
24,042
Reaction score
1,327
Location
Tacoma, WA
No one is going to pay TJack to be their starter, that ship has sailed for him.

I predict TJack will be our back up for a few more years.
 

SPOHAWK

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
1,839
Reaction score
392
We could pick him up for the Practice squad maybe? I'd be for that.
 

12thMan1

New member
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
724
Reaction score
0
bbsplitter":60rfk7ze said:
Sarlacc83":60rfk7ze said:
Great idea. TJ is not cheap and he's looked turrible. We should cut him for the 49ers' chump change.

...TJ's played awesome and is on a 1 year contract... Which means next year we are going to be likely competing against teams who would possibly pay him to be a possible starter. And I dont see us matching said money for him to be our backup.

Pretty sure Sarlacc was being sarcastic.
 

themunn

Well-known member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
4,037
Reaction score
644
What teams would conceivably consider T-Jack an upgrade?

He's not going to the Vikings, the Jags are getting whoever they want.

Other teams that would conceivably want a QB upgrade next year:

St Louis, Arizona, Houston, Oakland, MAYBE Tampa (depending on how Glennon pans out).

Can you foresee any of them specifically targetting Jackson?
 

CalgaryHawk

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
416
Reaction score
1
I heard rumors the Hawks liked him during the draft process so it makes some sense. At the very least, we could use a 3rd QB to throw passes to the receivers during practices.
 

Basis4day

Active member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
5,924
Reaction score
0
Don't need him. Let Lotulelie develop. Doesn't happen overnight and hes been on the roster for 4 whole games.
 

Evil_Shenanigans

New member
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
3,322
Reaction score
0
themunn said:
What teams would conceivably consider T-Jack an upgrade?

Would be Epic to see him in Oakland sending Matt Flynn packing!

Flynn will be in the CFL soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top