Are the Chiefs a Dynasty?

[Mizak]

Topic.

 

[bigskydoc]

Don’t see any argument that they aren’t.

 

[OneLofaTatupu]

Yes. 4 Super Bowl in 5 years winning 3 and back to back - imagine if they win next year

NFL needs what they got - keeps em sucking off the teet

 

[sc85sis]

Three SB wins and one loss in five years. I’d say yes.

 

[SonicHawk]

Easiest question of all time.

 

[NoGain]

Umm...is this a trick question?

 

[Cyrus12]

Absolutely..the next Patriots like legacy. I think Mahones wins 5 more.

 

[MyrtleHawk]

Yes and it's irritating as ****.

 

[fenderbender123]

No. Kansas City has only won 3 Super Bowls in the last 53 years. Not good enough.

 

[RiverDog]

No. Kansas City has only won 3 Super Bowls in the last 53 years. Not good enough.

They've gone to 4 of the past 5 SB's, winning 3 of them, including the last two in a row. In the past 5 years, the only season they didn't go to the SB they lost in the conference championship game....in overtime. They've gone to the AFCCG 6 straight seasons. They've won their division for 8 straight years, racked up 11 straight winning seasons, a 108-39 regular season record and a .735 winning percentage over the past 9 years and went to the playoffs in all 9 of those seasons. They are by far the most dominant team in recent history.

In this day and age of free agency and parity, that's a pretty amazing feat. Not quite to the level of the Patriots, but nevertheless impressive enough to qualify as a dynasty in my book.

 

[fenderbender123]

3 out of the last 53 Super Bowls.

 

[RiverDog]

3 out of the last 53 Super Bowls.

You're looking at too broad of a picture. No one uses over a half century to measure a dynasty. The New York Yankees, UCLA Bruins, New England Patriots, Montreal Canadians, and Boston Celtics wouldn't qualify as dynasties under those conditions.

 

[fenderbender123]

You're looking at too broad a picture. No one uses over a half century to measure a dynasty.

I do

 

[RiverDog]

I do.

To say that your opinion is an outlier is a gross understatement. Using 53 years to measure a dynasty is absurd.

 

[LastRideOut]

To say that your opinion is an outlier is a gross understatement. Using 53 years to measure a dynasty is absurd.

Fender is likely trolling you.

 

[RiverDog]

Fender is likely trolling you.

Yeah, now that you mention it, you're probably right. No one is that stupid.

 

[Bobblehead]

To say that your opinion is an outlier is a gross understatement. Using 53 years to measure a dynasty is absurd.

Sometimes a gross absurdity isn't enough.. where's the sarcasm emoji?

 

[fenderbender123]

To say that your opinion is an outlier is a gross understatement. Using 53 years to measure a dynasty is absurd.

Next year it's going to be 54 years. I'm progressive like that.

 

[pmedic920]

If not, they certainly have a good start.

 

[Chawker]

Only if they kick Taylor Swift to the curb. Then yes!