They've gone to 4 of the past 5 SB's, winning 3 of them, including the last two in a row. In the past 5 years, the only season they didn't go to the SB they lost in the conference championship game....in overtime. They've gone to the AFCCG 6 straight seasons. They've won their division for 8 straight years, racked up 11 straight winning seasons, a 108-39 regular season record and a .735 winning percentage over the past 9 years and went to the playoffs in all 9 of those seasons. They are by far the most dominant team in recent history.No. Kansas City has only won 3 Super Bowls in the last 53 years. Not good enough.
You're looking at too broad of a picture. No one uses over a half century to measure a dynasty. The New York Yankees, UCLA Bruins, New England Patriots, Montreal Canadians, and Boston Celtics wouldn't qualify as dynasties under those conditions.3 out of the last 53 Super Bowls.
You're looking at too broad a picture. No one uses over a half century to measure a dynasty.
To say that your opinion is an outlier is a gross understatement. Using 53 years to measure a dynasty is absurd.I do.
To say that your opinion is an outlier is a gross understatement. Using 53 years to measure a dynasty is absurd.
Yeah, now that you mention it, you're probably right. No one is that stupid.Fender is likely trolling you.
Sometimes a gross absurdity isn't enough.. where's the sarcasm emoji?To say that your opinion is an outlier is a gross understatement. Using 53 years to measure a dynasty is absurd.
To say that your opinion is an outlier is a gross understatement. Using 53 years to measure a dynasty is absurd.