Anyone see this about Browner?

[C-Dub]

Hello! The reason we didn't miss Browner last year was because they DID NOT HAVE Boldin. We all know this dude is very physical and needs that kind of coverage. If we ever needed Browner we need him for this game against this receiver. Remember when Boldin was with the Tards and we didn't have a physical corner to cover him? Short, short memories here. Browner was the injury I wanted to watch more than any other. If he does not play, it could be a very long day.

Dude, it's Boldin. It's not like he's even good. (Unless your measurement for good is beating up on Packers DB's.) Good receivers are ones like Crabtree, Megatron, Dez, and AJ.

Boldin will be held in check without much effort. It's Davis that you should worry about.

 

[iigakusei]

Browner listed as doubtful

 

[Evil_Shenanigans]

Such little faith in Thurm, Lane and Maxwell! Next Man up!

Go hawks.

 

[hawkfan68]

Hello! The reason we didn't miss Browner last year was because they DID NOT HAVE Boldin. We all know this dude is very physical and needs that kind of coverage. If we ever needed Browner we need him for this game against this receiver. Remember when Boldin was with the Tards and we didn't have a physical corner to cover him? Short, short memories here. Browner was the injury I wanted to watch more than any other. If he does not play, it could be a very long day.

Good point about Boldin. He is a good receiver, however the 49ers don't have Larry Fitzgerald on their team. The Cards did. Just a minor thing, you know.