Maelstrom787
Well-known member
TD/INT ratio is a prohibitively noisy statistic to use as an indicator of QB caliber and you do it routinely anyway, so I don't really see how you can ignore the others (the ones that happen to hurt your arguments, coincidentally.)You’re seriously using total yards as a key stat for QB success? Did you know these two stats you list are two of the lowest correlated for success for a QB? How many yards did Sam Howell throw for in Washington? Any guesses? Right at 4,000 yards so yeah you got me there I guess.
You then dismiss essentially everything else, especially advanced stats relating to accuracy, as being silly stats that only Twitter wonks care about, which is similarly obtuse.
I don't even see how this is especially relevant. The fact remains that, yes, if Darnold's rudimentary box score stat production drops, I'm not going to instantly blame him like most everyone did Geno. I'll blame the shit-ass job this FO has done at supporting the QB for years running, because NO ONE is winning a Super Bowl with anything resembling the supporting cast of the last few years.
And I can already hear the pitchforks if Darnold puts up like 22 TDs and 17 INTs about how he's a flash-in-the-pan overpaid goof and how we need to draft some goof named some shit like Hendryx McLaneKiffinQB in the first round next year or else we'll always be in "purgatory."
I'll defend Darnold against that crap just like I did Geno if the film backs it up. We're going nowhere unless we fix the issues surrounding the QB. We can bitch a little bit more about them after that, in my opinion.