Popeyejones
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,525
- Reaction score
- 0
Scottemojo":3zbgjg9r said:3 of the 4 NFC West teams have coaches who are heavily involved in choosing the players in the draft. The one that does not is picking highest in the draft.
This is simply untrue.
The division winner (the Cardinals) have a power structure in which Arians reports to the GM Keim, who has final say over all draft and free agency decisions, and also has final say over the 53 man roster. Arians only has final say over the active 46 in any given week. They did this because they regretted having given Wisenhunt control over the 53 in his contract.
The 2nd place team in the division (the Seahawks) give final say to all FA and draft decisions to Snyder, but final say over the 53 to Carroll.
The 3rd place Rams went for an even more equivalent GM/Coach relationship than the Seahawks, placing Snead and Fisher at equivalent levels in the hierarchy, with both of them reporting to the owner (Kroenke)
The last place 9ers have the same structure and division of labor as the 1st place Cardinals.
To suggest otherwise is simply dishonest or an honest mistake.
If you want to lean on "heavily involved", EVERY NFL team has both the coach and GM heavily involved in player selection process. There's not a team in the NFL that doesn't operate that way.
Two things:
1) As stated in this thread and born out over the years, having a division of labor between the GM and HC is just a better strategy with a higher probability of success.
2) As I may have said in this thread (or some other thread) a few days ago, often times in this division of labor the sticking point between "boss of the off-season" (i.e. GM) and "boss of the season" (i.e. the HC) is final say over the 53 man roster. The Cards don't give it to Arians because they got burned giving it to Wisenhunt, whereas the Seahawks do give it to Carroll.