Sterlinghawk
Member
You are WRONG
Mick063":216liaoz said:Normally when I link a pregame post that is spot on, someone gets pissed and asks me if I want a cookie.
I'll take chocolate chip.
From this link: http://www.seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 2#p1565662
Shane Vereen is the one player I fear most of the Pats. Of course if he is inserted the lineup, his mere presence may telegraph their intentions, but covering all the other receivers plus Vereen will stretch the Seattle coverage to it's limit. Absolutely no margin for error.
In my opinion, they could insert Vereen for the entirety of the game and throw delayed wheel routes all day long. Nickle and dime their way down the field. I haven't wrapped my head around how Seattle can stop it. Perhaps a second half adjustment would be to insert a dime package to counter when Vereen is in the game. Consider him to be an extra wide receiver (which he really is). I consider it the same as the Packers using Randall Cobb in the backfield.
The Patriots will have to make a few mistakes (penalties) to create predictable long yardage situations.
ThisHawkFan72":aze0skjc said:Even with the 28 points, we were on the doorstep of winning the game.
That's why the 28 points are not the real reason we lost.
It's plain as day. The real reason we lost is because we didn't run the ball from the 1 yard line. Don't try to overcomplicate it. That's the reason we lost. The 28 points didn't matter in the moment before that playcall.
Anthony!":34m55gsq said:Okay I will make it simple, it was not the defenses fault they played great, you cannot expect the #1 defense in the league to hold a 10 point lead with 1 qtr to go. Its not Kearses fault you cannot expect a Wr to catch a ball that hits his hands, its not bevel faults you cannot expect the OC to call a run play in an run situation, This is all Wilsons fault and this is why we should let him go we do not need him.