Normally I would agree with you that people should listen to direct sources for information and not just rely on second hand info.
However, in this case you say that people need to "listen between the lines" and "draw a conclusion or two". Yes, people should draw their own conclusions, but for the sake of discussion, it would probably be useful for people to know what conclusions you've drawn from this. Then people can agree or disagree as they wish.
Good point if I was looking for folks to agree or disagree with me, I’m not however.
I gave plenty enough context for anyone to gather a general feel for what I thought about the interview/press release if they are looking to agree or disagree with my personal opinion, after they form their own.
It’s my opinion, that we spend way too much time agreeing or disagreeing with others rather than just having a discussion about how we think or feel about a particular situation or subject.
I get it, this is a discussion board.
Not every “discussion” has to include agreeing or disagreeing, that’s only what most of these threads evolve into. It’s certainly not a requirement, and I personally believe we’d be a better place without the bickering that tends to happen.
If it’s conclusions folks want, they can conclude that I wouldn’t have posted the Q/A session if I didn’t find it a positive reflection on the team, or that I thought it would be worth their time to watch.
Fact of the matter is, I couldn’t care less if folks agree or disagree with my opinions.
I posted the video as a service because I thought they would enjoy it.
